Literature DB >> 14692185

A framework for selecting performance measures for opioid treatment programs.

Luc R Pelletier1, Jeffrey A Hoffman.   

Abstract

As a result of new federal regulations released in early 2001 that move the monitoring and evaluation of opioid treatment programs from a government regulation to an accreditation model, program staff members are now being challenged to develop performance measurement systems that improve care and service. Using measurement selection criteria is the first step in developing a performance measurement system as a component of an overall quality management (QM) strategy. Opioid treatment programs can "leapfrog" the development of such systems by using lessons learned from the healthcare quality industry. This article reviews performance measurement definitions, proposes performance measurement selection criteria, and makes a business case for Internet automation and accessibility. Performance measurement sets that are appropriate for opioid treatment programs are proposed, followed by a discussion on how performance measurement can be used within a comprehensive QM program. It is hoped that through development, adoption, and implementation of such a performance measurement program, treatment for clients and their families will continuously improve.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14692185      PMCID: PMC1473224          DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00430.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  11 in total

1.  Implications of managed care for methadone treatment. Findings from five case studies in New York State.

Authors:  G A Zarkin; L J Dunlap
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep

2.  Measuring the benefit of performance improvement and decision support.

Authors:  A H Rosenstein
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Economic notes: definitions of efficiency.

Authors:  S Palmer; D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

4.  Health communication on the Internet: an effective channel for health behavior change?

Authors:  M M Cassell; C Jackson; B Cheuvront
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar

5.  New Federal Regulations for Improving Quality in Opioid Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Luc R Pelletier; Jeffrey A Hoffman
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.095

6.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Assessing strategies for quality improvement.

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

Authors:  A T McLellan; L Luborsky; J Cacciola; J Griffith; F Evans; H L Barr; C P O'Brien
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Public substance abuse and managed behavioral healthcare. American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association and National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors, Inc.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Healthc Tomorrow       Date:  1999-02

10.  The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  A T McLellan; I O Arndt; D S Metzger; G E Woody; C P O'Brien
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.