Literature DB >> 14690849

Double standards: memory loading in temporal reference memory.

Luke Jones1, J H Wearden.   

Abstract

Three experiments compared human performance on temporal generalization tasks with either one or two different, and distinct, standard durations encoded. In the first two experiments participants received presentations of two different standards at the beginning of each trial block and were instructed to encode either one or both of them. When instructed to encode one standard they then had to judge whether each of a number of comparison stimuli was or was not that standard. When instructed to encode both they were then tested using just one of the standards but the participants were unaware, at the time of encoding, which standard would later be used as a reference. No marked effect of the number of temporal standards encoded was found. In Experiment 3 participants received either one or two temporal standards and had to use both when two were presented. This manipulation produced flatter generalization gradients when two standards were encoded than when just one was, and modelling attributed this difference mainly to an increase in reference memory variability in the double-standard case. This suggests that the variability of representation of durations in temporal reference memory can be systematically increased by increasing temporal reference memory load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14690849     DOI: 10.1080/02724990344000088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  12 in total

1.  Temporal memory of emotional experience.

Authors:  Raquel Cocenas-Silva; José Lino Oliveira Bueno; Sylvie Droit-Volet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Traces of times past: representations of temporal intervals in memory.

Authors:  Niels Taatgen; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

3.  How noise contributes to time-scale invariance of interval timing.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2013-05-29

4.  Interference between auditory and visual duration judgements suggests a common code for time.

Authors:  Pavlos C Filippopoulos; Pamela Hallworth; Sukye Lee; John H Wearden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-22

5.  Numerical magnitude affects temporal memories but not time encoding.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Ruiming Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Time dysperception perspective for acquired brain injury.

Authors:  Federica Piras; Fabrizio Piras; Valentina Ciullo; Emanuela Danese; Carlo Caltagirone; Gianfranco Spalletta
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  What is all the noise about in interval timing?

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The Impact of Perceptual/Concurrent and Mnemonic Digits on Temporal Processing: A Congruency Effect of Numerical Magnitudes.

Authors:  Zhao Fan; Guomin Jing; Xianfeng Ding; Xiaorong Cheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-09

9.  Memory bias in the temporal bisection point.

Authors:  Joshua M Levy; Vijay M K Namboodiri; Marshall G Hussain Shuler
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 10.  Temporal dysfunction in traumatic brain injury patients: primary or secondary impairment?

Authors:  Giovanna Mioni; Simon Grondin; Franca Stablum
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.