Literature DB >> 1468799

Effects of noise on mental performance with regard to subjective noise sensitivity.

G Belojević1, E Ohrström, R Rylander.   

Abstract

Objective and subjective effects of moderate levels of recorded traffic noise [Leq = 55 dB(A) and 75 dB(A)] on mental performance were studied in a laboratory setting. A total of 45 subjects (23 males and 22 females) were investigated with respect to subjective noise sensitivity (SNS). Four cognitive tasks were applied involving different psychological functions: Short-Term Memory (STM), Search and Memory 5 (SAM 5) (vigilance), Hidden Figures (HF) (spatial reasoning) and Mental Arithmetic (MA) (parallel processing). Three groups of 15 subjects were defined according to their scores on Weinstein's Noise Sensitivity Scale as tolerant, moderately sensitive or highly sensitive to noise. A similar level of performance was observed in the three groups under quiet conditions [30 dB(A) Leq], but under noisy conditions significant differences (P < 0.05) were seen between them on the STM (words) and MA (total results) tasks, and the lowest performance accuracy was demonstrated by the noise-sensitive subjects. SNS was the primary factor responsible for these differences. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of the SAM 5 and HF tasks, under either quiet or noisy conditions. Annoyance while performing tasks under noisy conditions was regularly and significantly higher among subjects judged to be noise sensitive on Weinstein's scale, as compared with those judged to have low or moderate SNS.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1468799     DOI: 10.1007/bf00378288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  31 in total

1.  Weinstein's Noise Sensitivity Scale: reliability and construct validity.

Authors:  B Ekehammar; S Dornic
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-02

2.  Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables.

Authors:  E Ohrström; M Björkman; R Rylander
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Noise-induced arousal and breadth of attention.

Authors:  J J O'Malley; A Poplawsky
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1971-12

4.  Arousal and information selection in short-term memory.

Authors:  G R Hockey; P Hamilton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  On the possibilities of changing the annoyance reaction to noise by changing the attitudes to the source of annoyance.

Authors:  S Sörensen
Journal:  Nord Hyg Tidskr Suppl       Date:  1970

Review 6.  Non-auditory effects of noise in industry. VII. Evaluation, conclusions and recommendations.

Authors:  F J van Dijk; J H Ettema; R L Zielhuis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  "Pessimistic noise effects": the perception of reaction times in noise.

Authors:  S Fisher
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Noise, sex and time of day effects in a mathematics task.

Authors:  M A Baker; D H Holding; M Loeb
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Individual differences in reactions to noise: a longitudinal study in a college dormitory.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1978-08

10.  The effects of noise on recall and recognition of instances of categories.

Authors:  A P Smith; D E Broadbent
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Sandrock; Martin Schütte; Barbara Griefahn
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  A review of decreased sound tolerance in autism: Definitions, phenomenology, and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Jason L He; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Does the Macro-Temporal Pattern of Road Traffic Noise Affect Noise Annoyance and Cognitive Performance?

Authors:  Beat Schäffer; Armin Taghipour; Jean Marc Wunderli; Mark Brink; Lél Bartha; Sabine J Schlittmeier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Cambridge Cognitive and Psychiatric Assessment Kit (CamCOPS): A Secure Open-Source Client-Server System for Mobile Research and Clinical Data Capture.

Authors:  Rudolf N Cardinal; Martin Burchell
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Level changes of traffic noise in kerman city, southeast iran.

Authors:  M Malakootian; M Ahmadian; K Yaghmaeian; Sh Dowlatshahi; Mr Ghotbi Ravandi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges.

Authors:  Sabine J Schlittmeier; Alexandra Feil; Andreas Liebl; J Rgen Hellbr Ck
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.