Literature DB >> 14687447

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological effects after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy.

In Hyang Kim1, Sung Kyu Park, Ok-Kyung Suh, Jung Mi Oh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological recovery following an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with high-dose chemotherapy.
METHODS: A retrospective case-controlled study.
RESULTS: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery above 0.5 x 10(9)/l and white blood cell (WBC) recovery above 4 x 10(9)/l for 3 consecutive days was achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim ((13.2 +/- 8.0 vs 19.0 +/- 10.0 days, p = 0.004), (16.9 +/- 9.7 vs 29.9 +/- 16.6 days, p = 0.001), respectively). The platelet recovery above 20 x 10(9)/l was also achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim (19.5 +/- 11.6 vs 27.2 +/- 13.8 days, p = 0.006). Furthermore, filgrastim-treated patients received fewer days of granulocyte colony simulating factor (G-CSF) administration (12.5 +/- 7.0 vs 18.6 +/- 8.5 days, p = 0.001) and spent less time in hospital (23.7 +/- 10.9 vs 32.0 +/- 17.6 days, p = 0.009). Duration of antibiotic administration was also significantly shorter in the filgrastim group (13.6 +/- 7.6 vs 29.1 +/- 19.8 days, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PBSCT following high-dose chemotherapy, filgrastim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and days of G-CSF administration, and led to earlier hospital discharge compared with lenograstim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14687447     DOI: 10.1185/030079903125002531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

1.  Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hisaharu Shikata; Ikue Takaoka; Tamami Horikawa; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Hiroshi Narumi; Takaaki Hato; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Use of biosimilar filgrastim compared with lenograstim in autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and in sibling allogeneic transplant.

Authors:  Shab Uddin; Pippa Russell; Maresa Farrell; Barbara Davy; Joe Taylor; Samir G Agrawal
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  Concerns about the use of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the mobilization of stem cells in normal donors: position of the World Marrow Donor Association.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw; Dennis L Confer; William Y Hwang; Derwood H Pamphilon; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim: effects on blood cell recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A Hüttmann; K Schirsafi; S Seeber; P Bojko
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Lenograstim: a review of its use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, for acceleration of neutrophil recovery following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Filgrastim XM02 (Tevagrastim®) after autologous stem cell transplantation compared to lenograstim: favourable cost-efficacy analysis.

Authors:  A Gardellini; F Gigli; A Babic; G Andreola; D Radice; S Sammassimo; G Martinelli; D Laszlo
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-06-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.