Literature DB >> 14687050

Automated self-initiated blood pressure or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy?

M A Brown1, L McHugh, G Mangos, G Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether self-initiated and recorded automated blood pressure measurement can provide an accurate estimate of ambulatory blood pressure in pregnant women suspected of having 'white coat hypertension'.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
SETTING: Women's and Children's Health Unit, St George Hospital, a teaching hospital of the University of New South Wales. POPULATION: Pregnant women being assessed for possible 'white-coat hypertension'.
METHODS: Sixty-six pregnant women who were undergoing 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in their home or work environment also measured their blood pressure six times during this interval using a self-initiated automated blood pressure recorder (Omron HEM 705CP). Agreement between awake ABPM and Omron recorded blood pressures was tested by Bland-Altman analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Limits of agreement between blood pressures measured by each device.
RESULTS: Average blood pressures obtained by the two devices were identical (125/77 mmHg) but limits of agreement were wide, -20 to +23 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -9 to +15 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure.
CONCLUSION: The Omron HEM 705CP is a useful device for measuring group average blood pressures in pregnant women suspected of having white coat hypertension but cannot reliably replace ABPM for clinical management of individual pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14687050     DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Kathryn S Taylor; Carole Crawford; James A Hodgkinson; Clare Bankhead; Tricia Carver; Elizabeth Ewers; Margaret Glogowska; Sheila M Greenfield; Lucy Ingram; Lisa Hinton; Khalid S Khan; Louise Locock; Lucy Mackillop; Christine McCourt; Alexander M Pirie; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Consistency among Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Values in Women with Chronic Hypertension and History of Eclampsia or Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ewa Wojciechowska; Piotr Sobieraj; Maciej Siński; Maria Anna Zaborska-Dworak; Piotr Gryglas; Jacek Lewandowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen Tran; Raj Padwal; Nadia Khan; Mary-Doug Wright; Wee Shian Chan
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15

4.  How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy?

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Clare Bankhead; James Hodgkinson; Nia Roberts; Richard Stevens; Carl Heneghan; Évelyne Rey; Chern Lo; Manju Chandiramani; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Asma Khalil; Kathryn Marko; Jason Waugh; Mark Brown; Carole Crawford; Kathryn S Taylor; Lucy Mackillop; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.