Literature DB >> 14686531

Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Howard D Rundle1.   

Abstract

While the feasibility of bottleneck-induced speciation is in doubt, population bottlenecks may still affect the speciation process by interacting with divergent selection. To explore this possibility, I conducted a laboratory speciation experiment using Drosophila pseudoobscura involving 78 replicate populations assigned in a two-way factorial design to both bottleneck (present vs. absent) and environment (ancestral vs. novel) treatments. Populations independently evolved under these treatments and were then tested for assortative mating and male mating success against their common ancestor. Bottlenecks alone did not generate any premating isolation, despite an experimental design that was conducive to bottleneck-induced speciation. Premating isolation also did not evolve in the novel environment treatment, neither in the presence nor absence of bottlenecks. However, male mating success was significantly reduced in the novel environment treatment, both as a plastic response to this environment and as a result of environment-dependent inbreeding effects in the bottlenecked populations. Reduced mating success of derived males will hamper speciation by enhancing the mating success of immigrant, ancestral males. Novel environments are generally thought to promote ecological speciation by generating divergent natural selection. In the current experiment, however, the novel environment did not cause the evolution of any premating isolation and it reduced the likelihood of speciation through its effects on male mating success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14686531     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  A test of founder effect speciation using multiple loci in the auklets (Aethia spp.).

Authors:  H E Walsh; I L Jones; V L Friesen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments.

Authors:  Timothy H Vines; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Species Differentiation on a Dynamic Landscape: Shifts in Metapopulation Genetic Structure Using the Chronology of the Hawaiian Archipelago.

Authors:  George K Roderick; Peter J P Croucher; Amy G Vandergast; Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 4.  Sexual Communication in the Drosophila Genus.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle Bontonou; Claude Wicker-Thomas
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Anders Odeen; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Divergent adaptation promotes reproductive isolation among experimental populations of the filamentous fungus Neurospora.

Authors:  Jeremy R Dettman; James B Anderson; Linda M Kohn
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Interaction between temperature and male pheromone in sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Bontonou; B Denis; C Wicker-Thomas
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.