Literature DB >> 14685107

Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results from phase II of a statewide quality improvement initiative.

William L Holman1, Monique Sansom, Catarina I Kiefe, Eric D Peterson, Steve G Hubbard, James F Delong, Richard M Allman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/
BACKGROUND: This report describes the first round of results for Phase II of the Alabama CABG Project, a regional quality improvement initiative.
METHODS: Charts submitted by all hospitals in Alabama performing CABG (ICD-9 codes 36.10-36.20) were reviewed by a Clinical Data Abstraction Center (CDAC) (preintervention 1999-2000; postintervention 2000-2001). Variables that described quality in Phase I were abstracted for Phase II and data describing the new variables of beta-blocker use and lipid management were collected. Data samples collected onsite by participating hospitals were used for rapid cycle improvement in Phase II.
RESULTS: CDAC data (n = 1927 cases in 1999; n = 2001 cases in 2000) showed that improvements from Phase I in aspirin prescription, internal mammary artery use, and duration of intubation persisted in Phase II. During Phase II, use of beta-blockers before, during, or after CABG increased from 65% to 76% of patients (P < 0.05). Appropriate lipid management, an aggregate variable, occurred in 91% of patients before and 91% after the educational intervention. However, there were improvements in 3 of 5 subcategories for lipid management (documenting a lipid disorder [52%-57%], initiating drug therapy [45%-53%], and dietary counseling [74%-91%]; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In Phase II, this statewide process-oriented quality improvement program added two new measures of quality. Achievements of quality improvement from Phase I persisted in Phase II, and improvements were seen in the new variables of lipid management and perioperative use of beta-blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14685107      PMCID: PMC1356199          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103065.17661.8f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  L Cohn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Impact of early discharge after coronary artery bypass graft surgery on rates of hospital readmission and death. The Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators.

Authors:  P A Cowper; E D Peterson; E R DeLong; J G Jollis; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Early discharge after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: are patients really going home earlier?

Authors:  H L Lazar; C A Fitzgerald; T Ahmad; Y Bao; T Colton; O M Shapira; R J Shemin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Determinants of prolonged length of hospital stay after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  W S Weintraub; E L Jones; J Craver; R Guyton; C Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results of a statewide quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  W L Holman; R M Allman; M Sansom; C I Kiefe; E D Peterson; K J Anstrom; S S Sankey; S G Hubbard; R G Sherrill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; J J Allison; O D Williams; S D Person; M T Weaver; N W Weissman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting Cooperative Project: baseline data. Alabama CABG Cooperative Project Study Group.

Authors:  W L Holman; E D Peterson; C L Athanasuleas; R M Allman; M Sansom; C Kiefe; R G Sherrill
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Effect of an aggressive lipid-lowering strategy on progression of atherosclerosis in the left main coronary artery from patients in the post coronary artery bypass graft trial.

Authors:  C W White; F L Gobel; L Campeau; G L Knatterud; S A Forman; J S Forrester; N L Geller; J A Herd; A Hickey; B J Hoogwerf; D B Hunninghake; Y Rosenberg; M L Terrin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Preoperative beta-blocker use and mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery in North America.

Authors:  T Bruce Ferguson; Laura P Coombs; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery.

Authors:  L C Erickson; D F Torchiana; E C Schneider; J W Newburger; E L Hannan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Postoperative inotrope and vasopressor use following CABG: outcome data from the CAPS-care study.

Authors:  Judson B Williams; Adrian F Hernandez; Shuang Li; Rachel S Dokholyan; Sean M O'Brien; Peter K Smith; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Rajendra H Mehta; Gail E Hafley; Judson B Williams; Michael J Mack; Eric D Peterson; Keith B Allen; Robert A Harrington; C Michael Gibson; Robert M Califf; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; T Bruce Ferguson; John H Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A regional quality improvement effort to increase beta blocker administration before vascular surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Brian W Nolan; Daniel J Bertges; Donald S Likosky; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Disseminating quality improvement: study protocol for a large cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrew R Quanbeck; David H Gustafson; James H Ford; Alice Pulvermacher; Michael T French; K John McConnell; Dennis McCarty
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Using risk models to improve patient selection for high-risk vascular surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.