OBJECTIVE: To follow the evolution of coreceptor use in HIV-1-infected individuals with varying rates of disease progression. METHODS: The coreceptor use of 278 sequential HIV-1 isolates from 23 individuals was tested by infection of two human cell lines, U87.CD4 and GHOST(3), expressing CD4 and CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, CXCR4, CXCR6 or BOB. Differences in coreceptor use were further dissected by testing chimeric coreceptors constructed by exchanging successively larger parts of CCR5 for corresponding regions of CXCR4. RESULTS: Three patterns of coreceptor use were distinguished: no evolution, evolution to CXCR4 use, and fluctuation. No evolution with stable CCR5 use (R5 phenotype) was linked to slow progression over 8-10 years in four patients. CXCR4-using virus was present from the onset (five patients) or appeared during clinical progression in all other patients, while taking zidovudine or didanosine monotherapy. The fluctuating pattern of coreceptor use, defined as reappearance of virus with R5 phenotype, was observed in five patients and, interestingly, followed initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy in three of these. Monotropic R5 or X4 viruses were more selective in chimeric receptor use than R5X4 or multitropic viruses. Most importantly, the efficiency of chimeric receptor use increased over time. CONCLUSION: The increase in efficiency of chimeric receptor use allows a new interpretation of evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor use. Evolution could be a continuous process that may lead to changes in the way a coreceptor is used, with the potential of profound alteration in signalling at that receptor.
OBJECTIVE: To follow the evolution of coreceptor use in HIV-1-infected individuals with varying rates of disease progression. METHODS: The coreceptor use of 278 sequential HIV-1 isolates from 23 individuals was tested by infection of two human cell lines, U87.CD4 and GHOST(3), expressing CD4 and CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, CXCR4, CXCR6 or BOB. Differences in coreceptor use were further dissected by testing chimeric coreceptors constructed by exchanging successively larger parts of CCR5 for corresponding regions of CXCR4. RESULTS: Three patterns of coreceptor use were distinguished: no evolution, evolution to CXCR4 use, and fluctuation. No evolution with stable CCR5 use (R5 phenotype) was linked to slow progression over 8-10 years in four patients. CXCR4-using virus was present from the onset (five patients) or appeared during clinical progression in all other patients, while taking zidovudine or didanosine monotherapy. The fluctuating pattern of coreceptor use, defined as reappearance of virus with R5 phenotype, was observed in five patients and, interestingly, followed initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy in three of these. Monotropic R5 or X4 viruses were more selective in chimeric receptor use than R5X4 or multitropic viruses. Most importantly, the efficiency of chimeric receptor use increased over time. CONCLUSION: The increase in efficiency of chimeric receptor use allows a new interpretation of evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor use. Evolution could be a continuous process that may lead to changes in the way a coreceptor is used, with the potential of profound alteration in signalling at that receptor.
Authors: Maria José Duenas-Decamp; Paul J Peters; Alexander Repik; Thomas Musich; Maria Paz Gonzalez-Perez; Catherine Caron; Richard Brown; Jonathan Ball; Paul R Clapham Journal: Future Virol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.831
Authors: Ingrid Karlsson; Jean-Charles Grivel; Silvia Sihui Chen; Anders Karlsson; Jan Albert; Eva Maria Fenyö; Leonid B Margolis Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Ulf Karlsson; Liselotte Antonsson; Johanna Repits; Patrik Medstrand; Christer Owman; Karin Kidd-Ljunggren; Lars Hagberg; Bo Svennerholm; Marianne Jansson; Magnus Gisslén; Bengt Ljungberg Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Ingrid Karlsson; Liselotte Antonsson; Yu Shi; Monica Oberg; Anders Karlsson; Jan Albert; Björn Olde; Christer Owman; Marianne Jansson; Eva Maria Fenyö Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Paolo Lusso; Richard W Crowley; Mauro S Malnati; Clelia Di Serio; Maurilio Ponzoni; Angelique Biancotto; Phillip D Markham; Robert C Gallo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205