Literature DB >> 14684622

Effect of a controlled feedback intervention on laboratory test ordering by community physicians.

Peter S Bunting1, Carl Van Walraven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies of interventions to reduce laboratory test utilization have occurred in academic hospital settings, used historical controls, or have had short post intervention follow-up. Interventions with the greatest impact use multiple approaches, are repeated regularly, include comparisons with physician peers, and have a personal approach. We determined whether laboratory test utilization by community physicians could be reduced by a multifaceted program of education and feedback.
METHODS: We identified 200 physicians who ordered the largest number of common laboratory tests during 1 year in a nonhospital, commercial community (reference) laboratory. They were assigned to intervention and control groups (100 each). Intervention physicians were visited individually up to three times by laboratory representatives over a 2-year period. At each visit, educational material and the physician's personal laboratory test utilization data were presented and discussed briefly in general terms, with the latter compared with utilization data for the physician's peers. Overall test utilization rates 1 year before, during, and 2 years after the intervention were measured using population-based databases. Time-series analysis was used to determine the effect of the intervention on laboratory test utilization.
RESULTS: The two groups began with similar test utilization: control group, 4.06 x 10(6) tests in 1.48 x 10(6) visits (2.73 tests/visit); intervention group, 3.90 x 10(6) tests in 1.41 x 10(6) visits (2.77 tests/visit). During the 2-year intervention, intention-to-treat analysis showed that utilization decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the controls [relative reduction of 7.9% (P <0.0001); absolute reduction of 0.22 tests/visit (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.24)]. This difference persisted until the end of study observation, or more than 2 years after the intervention ended.
CONCLUSION: A multifaceted education and feedback strategy can significantly and persistently decrease laboratory utilization by practicing community physicians.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14684622     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.025098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  18 in total

1.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Rational test ordering in family medicine.

Authors:  Simon Morgan; Mieke van Driel; Justin Coleman; Parker Magin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Anticoagulation control in the peri-hospitalization period.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Alan J Forster
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The impact of cost displays on primary care physician laboratory test ordering.

Authors:  Daniel M Horn; Kate E Koplan; Margaret D Senese; E John Orav; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A quality assurance initiative targeting radiation exposure to neuroscience patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sheila Chan; S Andrew Josephson; Laura Rosow; Wade S Smith
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-01

6.  Inappropriately repeated lipid tests in a tertiary hospital in Greece: the magnitude and cost of the phenomenon.

Authors:  V Iliadi; C Kastanioti; G Maropoulos; D Niakas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  Disclosure of physician-specific behavior improves blood utilization protocol adherence in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Claude A Beaty; Kara A Haggerty; Madeline G Moser; Timothy J George; Chase W Robinson; George J Arnaoutakis; Glenn J Whitman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Temporal growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities.

Authors:  John Busby; Knut Schroeder; Wolfram Woltersdorf; Jonathan A C Sterne; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Alastair Hay; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  A cluster randomized controlled trial aimed at implementation of local quality improvement collaboratives to improve prescribing and test ordering performance of general practitioners: study protocol.

Authors:  Jasper Trietsch; Trudy van der Weijden; Wim Verstappen; Rob Janknegt; Paul Muijrers; Ron Winkens; Ben van Steenkiste; Richard Grol; Job Metsemakers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The good, the bad, and the unknown: quality of clinical laboratories in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Ali M Elbireer; J Brooks Jackson; Hakim Sendagire; Alex Opio; Danstan Bagenda; Timothy K Amukele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.