Literature DB >> 14683656

The waiting game: bridging to paediatric heart transplantation.

Allan P Goldman1, Jane Cassidy, Marc de Leval, Simon Haynes, Katherine Brown, Pauline Whitmore, Gordon Cohen, Victor Tsang, Martin Elliott, Anne Davison, Leslie Hamilton, David Bolton, Jo Wray, Asif Hasan, Rosemary Radley-Smith, Duncan Macrae, Jon Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although mechanical circulatory support might not increase the number of adults surviving to transplantation, because of the shortage of donor organs, the situation might be different for children. Our aim was to assess the effect of mechanical assist devices to bridge children with end-stage cardiomyopathy to heart transplantation.
METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review was undertaken with data from the UK paediatric transplant programme and from bridging to transplant done at two paediatric transplant centres in the UK.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2002, 22 children with end-stage cardiomyopathy, median age 5.7 years (range 1.2-17), were supported by a mechanical assist device as a bridge to first heart transplantation, with a 77% survival rate to hospital discharge. Nine were supported by a paracorporeal ventricular assist device, six received transplantation, five survived to discharge (55%), with one late death. 13 were supported by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, and 12 were transplanted and survived to discharge (92%) with one late death. With urgent listing, the median waiting time for a heart was 7.5 days (range 1.5-22 days). The correlation between the proportion of patients bridged to transplantation and the proportion of patients dying while on the transplant waiting list was r=-0.93, p=0.02.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings lend support to the hypothesis that a national mechanical assist programme to bridge children to transplantation can minimise the number dying while on the heart transplant waiting list. In the context of urgent listing and a short waiting time, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation seems to provide the safest form of support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14683656     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15015-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Deborah J Kozik; Mark D Plunkett
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Asynchronous Pumping of a Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Device in a Pediatric Anastomosis Model.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; William J Weiss; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Options for the failing ventricle in pediatric heart disease.

Authors:  Mazyar Kanani; Tain-Yen Hsia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Preclinical performance of a pediatric mechanical circulatory support device: The PediaFlow ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Salim E Olia; Peter D Wearden; Timothy M Maul; Venkat Shankarraman; Ergin Kocyildirim; Shaun T Snyder; Patrick M Callahan; Marina V Kameneva; William R Wagner; Harvey S Borovetz; James F Antaki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  The impact of heart failure severity at time of listing for cardiac transplantation on survival in pediatric cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ranae L Larsen; Charles E Canter; David C Naftel; Margaret Tressler; David N Rosenthal; Elizabeth D Blume; William T Mahle; Delphine Yung; William R Morrow; E John Orav; James D Wilkinson; Jeffrey A Towbin; Stephen E Lipshultz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Clinical experience with Berlin Heart Excor in pediatric patients in Argentina: 1373 days of cardiac support.

Authors:  Guillermo E Moreno; Alberto Charroqui; María L Pilán; Ricardo H Magliola; Mariela P Krynski; María Althabe; Luis M Landry; Gabriela Sciuccati; Alejandra Villa; Horacio Vogelfang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-03-01

8.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Carlo R Bartoli; Steven C Koenig; Constantine Ionan; Kevin J Gillars; Mike E Mitchell; Erle H Austin; Laman A Gray; George M Pantalos
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Assessment of hydraulic performance and biocompatibility of a MagLev centrifugal pump system designed for pediatric cardiac or cardiopulmonary support.

Authors:  Kurt A Dasse; Barry Gellman; Marina V Kameneva; Joshua R Woolley; Carl A Johnson; Thomas Gempp; John D Marks; Stella Kent; Andrew Koert; J Scott Richardson; Steve Franklin; Trevor A Snyder; Peter Wearden; William R Wagner; Richard J Gilbert; Harvey S Borovetz
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.