Literature DB >> 14683557

Bilateral anterior thalamic nucleus lesions and high-frequency stimulation are protective against pilocarpine-induced seizures and status epilepticus.

Clement Hamani1, Flavio I S Ewerton, Saulo M Bonilha, Gerson Ballester, Luiz E A M Mello, Andres M Lozano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The thalamus is thought to play an important role in secondary generalization of seizures. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of anterior thalamic nucleus lesions and high-frequency stimulation in the pilocarpine model of secondarily generalized seizures in rats.
METHODS: Adult Wistar rats underwent unilateral (n = 7) or bilateral anterior nucleus thalamotomies (n = 10), or unilateral (n = 4) or bilateral (n = 9) anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation through implanted electrodes. Control animals (n = 9) received bilateral implants but no stimulation. Seven days after these procedures, animals were provided pilocarpine (320 mg/kg intraperitoneally) to induce seizures and status epilepticus (SE). Electrographic recordings from hippocampal and cortical electrodes were evaluated, and ictal behavior was assessed.
RESULTS: In the control group, 67% of the animals developed SE 15.3 +/- 8.8 minutes after pilocarpine administration. Neither unilateral anterior nucleus lesions nor stimulation significantly reduced the propensity or latency for developing seizures and SE. Bilateral thalamic stimulation did not prevent SE (observed in 56% of the animals), but it significantly prolonged the latency to its development (48.4 +/- 17.7 min, P = 0.02). Strikingly, no animal with bilateral anterior nucleus thalamotomies developed seizures or SE with pilocarpine.
CONCLUSION: Bilateral anterior thalamic nuclear complex stimulation and thalamotomies were protective against SE induced by pilocarpine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14683557     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000097552.31763.ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  18 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation for intractable epilepsy: which target and for which seizures?

Authors:  Andres M Kanner
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy: Biomarkers for Optimization.

Authors:  Katrina L Dell; Mark J Cook; Matias I Maturana
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Chemically activated luminopsins allow optogenetic inhibition of distributed nodes in an epileptic network for non-invasive and multi-site suppression of seizure activity.

Authors:  Jack K Tung; Fu Hung Shiu; Kevin Ding; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Electrical stimulation of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) suppresses chemically induced neocortical seizures in rats.

Authors:  Heng Guo; Hua Zhang; Yongqin Kuang; Chao Wang; Xiaorong Jing; Jianwen Gu; Guodong Gao
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.444

5.  Analysis of gene expression changes in the rat hippocampus after deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Tharakeswari Selvakumar; Kambiz N Alavian; Travis Tierney
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Seizures and Sleep in the Thalamus: Focal Limbic Seizures Show Divergent Activity Patterns in Different Thalamic Nuclei.

Authors:  Li Feng; Joshua E Motelow; Chanthia Ma; William Biche; Cian McCafferty; Nicholas Smith; Mengran Liu; Qiong Zhan; Ruonan Jia; Bo Xiao; Alvaro Duque; Hal Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  [Treatment of epilepsy: peripheral and central stimulation techniques].

Authors:  A Schulze-Bonhage; V Coenen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Deep brain stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Casey H Halpern; Uzma Samadani; Brian Litt; Jurg L Jaggi; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Should stimulation parameters be individualized to stop seizures: Evidence in support of this approach.

Authors:  Tiwalade Sobayo; David J Mogul
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Deep Brain Stimulation in Epilepsy: A Role for Modulation of the Mammillothalamic Tract in Seizure Control?

Authors:  Frédéric L W V J Schaper; Birgit R Plantinga; Albert J Colon; G Louis Wagner; Paul Boon; Nadia Blom; Erik D Gommer; Govert Hoogland; Linda Ackermans; Rob P W Rouhl; Yasin Temel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.