Literature DB >> 14682514

Antennal responses to floral scents in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene.

Susanna Andersson1, Heidi E M Dobson.   

Abstract

Floral scent, together with visual floral cues, are important signals to adult butterflies searching for food-rewarding plants. To identify which compounds in a floral scent are more attractive and, thus, of biological importance to foraging butterflies, we applied electrophysiological methods. Antennal responses of male and female adults of the tropical butterfly Heliconius melpomene L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae) to individual compounds of natural floral scents and synthetic floral scent mixtures were investigated using gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD). The natural floral scents included those of two tropical plant species, Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae) and Warszewiczia coccinea (Vahl) Kl. (Rubiaceae), and two temperate species, Buddleja davidii Franchet (Loganiaceae) and Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (Asteraceae). The two synthetic floral scent mixtures contained many of the compounds found in the natural scents, but all in equal quantities. Compounds both present in relatively high abundance in the floral scents and detected exclusively in the floral parts of the plant, such as linalool, linalool oxide (furanoid) I and II, oxoisophoroneoxide, and phenylacetaldehyde, elicited the strongest antennal responses, suggesting that they may reflect adaptations by the plant to attract butterfly pollinators. However, other compounds also present in high abundance in the floral scent, but detected in the vegetative as well as floral plant parts, either elicited strong antennal responses, such as trans-beta-ocimene and benzaldehyde, or failed to elicit antennal responses, such as the sesquiterpenes beta-caryophyllene and alpha-humulene from L. camara. The most volatile monoterpene alkenes in the synthetic scent mixtures elicited only low or no responses. Furthermore, the overall antennal responses were stronger in females than in males. The findings suggest that several floral scent volatiles, especially those of exclusively floral origin, are of high biological significance to H. melpomene butterflies. These include compounds of different biosynthetic origins belonging to the benzenoids, monoterpenoids, and irregular terpenoids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14682514     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026278531806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  6 in total

1.  Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  L E Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies.

Authors:  Ola Jennersten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Patterns of pollen exploitation by Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Carol L Boggs; John T Smiley; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  COEVOLUTION OF PLANTS AND HERBIVORES: PASSION FLOWER BUTTERFLIES.

Authors:  Woodruff W Benson; Keith S Brown; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Do Peacock butterflies (Inachis io L.) detect and prefer nectar amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds?

Authors:  Andreas Erhardt; Hans-Peter Rusterholz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: Identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles.

Authors:  R Baur; P Feeny; E Städler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.626

  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  Comparison of glass vessels and plastic bags for enclosing living plant parts for headspace analysis.

Authors:  Alex Stewart-Jones; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species of Gymnadenia (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Franz K Huber; Roman Kaiser; Willi Sauter; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sex-specific chemical cues from immatures facilitate the evolution of mate guarding in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Catalina Estrada; Selma Yildizhan; Stefan Schulz; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  An antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene butterflies.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Catalina Estrada; Selma Yildizhan; Michael Boppré; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Floral odors of Silene otites: their variability and attractiveness to mosquitoes.

Authors:  Umma Salma Jhumur; Stefan Dötterl; Andreas Jürgens
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Landscape structure shapes habitat finding ability in a butterfly.

Authors:  Erik Öckinger; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Odour maps in the brain of butterflies with divergent host-plant preferences.

Authors:  Mikael A Carlsson; Sonja Bisch-Knaden; Alexander Schäpers; Raimondas Mozuraitis; Bill S Hansson; Niklas Janz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Plant volatiles, rather than light, determine the nocturnal behavior of a caterpillar.

Authors:  Kaori Shiojiri; Rika Ozawa; Junji Takabayashi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Variation in floral scent compounds recognized by honeybees in Brassicaceae crop species.

Authors:  Kiwa Kobayashi; Miyako Arai; Atsushi Tanaka; Shigeru Matsuyama; Hiroshi Honda; Ryo Ohsawa
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Interspecific variation of floral scent composition in Glochidion and its association with host-specific pollinating seed parasite (Epicephala).

Authors:  Tomoko Okamoto; Atsushi Kawakita; Makoto Kato
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 2.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.