Literature DB >> 14681955

Perception of breast cancer risk and surveillance behaviours of women with family history of breast cancer: a brief report on a Spanish cohort.

Francisco Gil1, Ignacio Méndez, Agustina Sirgo, Gemma Llort, Ignacio Blanco, Hernán Cortés-Funes.   

Abstract

Women with a family history of breast cancer (FHBC) are at increased risk for developing this disease. In this study, we have investigated the differences between two groups of women; those with family history of breast cancer (N=42) and women at population risk (N=42) in a Spanish cohort. Questionnaires assessed distress, perception of breast cancer risk, screening behaviours, coping skills, personality and quality of life. Neither group received genetic counselling before or after this study. Women with FHBC overestimated their risk of developing breast cancer. They report a subjective risk of developing breast cancer of 50%, with their actual risk, using the risk tables elaborated by Claus et al., being only 15% (p<0.05). Discriminant function analysis revealed the patients' information about breast cancer, worries about breast cancer, perception of risk based on family history, perception of lifetime risk of breast cancer and quality of life were the five variables that distinguished between both groups. Only 34% of women in the FHBC group performed monthly breast self-examination, 24% (10 subjects) had never attended previously for clinical breast examination and 45% (19 subjects) had never undergone a mammogram. This group of women had a significantly lower level of general satisfaction (p<0.05), an indicator of Quality of Life. The results support the need for developing psychological intervention for women with family history of breast cancer in order to increase adherence to surveillance behaviours, reduce distress, improve quality of life, and assure the earliest detection of breast cancer. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14681955     DOI: 10.1002/pon.704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  Concerns about inherited risk of breast cancer prior to diagnosis in Japanese patients with breast complaints.

Authors:  Noriko Ando; Yumi Iwamitsu; Masaru Kuranami; Shigemi Okazaki; Kenji Yamamoto; Masahiko Watanabe; Hitoshi Miyaoka
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Gil; Luigi Grassi; Luzia Travado; Michele Tomamichel; Juan Ramón Gonzalez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The withdrawal from oncogenetic counselling and testing for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. A descriptive study of an Italian sample.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Gabriella Maggi; Fabio Massimo Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-24

4.  Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Bruna Marozzo; Fabio M Sega; Isabella Sperduti; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-21

Review 5.  Four Actionable Bottlenecks and Potential Solutions to Translating Psychiatric Genetics Research: An Expert Review.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; Rachel A Davies; Elizabeth C Long
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Psychological characteristics and subjective symptoms as determinants of psychological distress in patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Noriko Ando; Yumi Iwamitsu; Masaru Kuranami; Shigemi Okazaki; Mei Wada; Kenji Yamamoto; Keiko Todoroki; Masahiko Watanabe; Hitoshi Miyaoka
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Katherine M James; Pamela S Sinicrope; David T Eton; Brian A Costello; Jantey Carey; Melanie A Lane; Shawna L Ehlers; Patricia J Erwin; Katherine E Nowakowski; Mohammad H Murad
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Assessing Stakeholder Perceptions of the Utility of Genetic Information for the Clinical Care of Mental Health Disorders: We Have a Will but Need to See the Way.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; John M Hettema; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Michael A Southam-Gerow
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-03

9.  Worry is good for breast cancer screening: a study of female relatives from the ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.