| Literature DB >> 14680494 |
Ignacio García-Tuñón1, Mónica Ricote, Antonio Ruiz, Benito Fraile, Ricardo Paniagua, Mar Royuela.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The presence and distribution of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and its receptor complex (Ralpha, Rbeta, Rgamma) were studied in 52 women who were clinically and histopathologically diagnosed with breast tumours (17 in situ and 35 infiltrating), and in 13 women with benign fibrocystic lesions in the breast.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14680494 PMCID: PMC314448 DOI: 10.1186/bcr730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466
Figure 1IL-2 immunostaining. (a) Thymus sections were used as a positive control. Fibrocystic lesions show either no immunoreaction (b) or a weak immunoreaction limited to a circumscribed supranuclear region (c). In ductal in situ (d) and ductal infiltrating (e) carcinomas, most of the cytoplasm was labelled. Original magnification ×375.
Figure 2Immunostaining of IL-2Rα. (a) Moderate staining of thymus section. (b) Fibrocystic lesions showing a weak immunoreaction. (c) Lobular in situ carcinoma showing moderate immunostaining. (d) Lobular infiltrating carcinoma showing a more intense immunostaining. Original magnification ×375.
Figure 3Immunostaining of IL-2Rβ. (a) Thymus sections were always positive. (b) Fibrocystic lesions showing a weak immunoreaction. Ductal in situ carcinoma (c) and ductal infiltrating carcinoma (d) showing intense immunostaining. Original magnification ×375.
Figure 4Immunostaining of IL-2Rγ. (a) Presence of positive immunoreaction in thymus sections. (b) Fibrocystic lesions showing moderate immunoreaction. (c) Lobular in situ carcinoma in which immunostaining was more intense. (d) Even more intense immunostaining in lobular infiltrating carcinoma than in in situ carcinoma. Original magnification ×375.
Comparison of immunostaining intensities between groups of breast samples
| L-2 | L-2Rα | Il-2Rβ | IL-2Rγ | |||||
| Group (no. of cases) | Positive samples | Optical density | Positive samples | Optical density | Positive samples | Optical density | Positive samples | Optical density |
| Human thymus (4) | 4 (100%) | 12.1 ± 1.2 | 4 (100%) | 10.07 ± 1.47 | 4 (100%) | 14.33 ± 2.1 | 4 (100%) | 13.21 ± 0.89 |
| Fibrocystic benign lesions (13) | 5 (38.5%) | 4.02 ± 0.37a | 7 (53.8%) | 7.13 ± 0.19a | 4 (30.8%) | 2.05 ± 0.35a | 6 (46.1%) | 15.40 ± 2.4a |
| 7 (41.2%) | 20.47 ± 2.42b | 6 (35.3%) | 20.30 ± 1.29b | 6 (35.3%) | 28.90 ± 1.15b | 7 (41.2%) | 25.05 ± 2.5b | |
| Infiltrating carcinomas (35) | 29 (82.9%) | 26.93 ± 4.82c | 21 (60.0%) | 52.92 ± 4.77c | 28 (80.0%) | 31.22 ± 6.80b | 28 (80.0%) | 40.82 ± 5.78c |
| Lymph node infiltration (13) | 11 (84.6%) | 28.24 ± 4.9c | 11 (84.6%) | 54.41 ± 4.8c | 10 (76.9%) | 28.94 ± 5.66b | 12 (92.3%) | 38. 8 ± 6.12c |
| Neither lymph node infiltration nor metastasis (22) | 18 (81.8%) | 26.06 ± 4.89c | 10 (45.4%) | 51.55 ± 4.79c | 18 (81.8%) | 32.28 ± 6.80b | 16 (72.7%) | 42.16 ± 6.93c |
Optical densities are means ± SD. Values denoted by different superscripts are significantly different from each other. Those values sharing the same superscript are not statistically different from each other. Statistical analysis refers to each antibody separately. Significance was determined by multiple comparisons by the Fisher and Behrens test at P ≤ 0.05.