Literature DB >> 14679443

Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate.

Benjamin A Lipsky1, Kamal Itani, Carl Norden.   

Abstract

Foot infections in diabetic patients are predominantly caused by gram-positive cocci, many of which are now antibiotic resistant. Because linezolid is active against these pathogens, we compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral formulations with that of intravenous ampicillin-sulbactam and intravenous and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate given for 7-28 days in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of all types of foot infection in diabetic patients (ratio of linezolid to comparator drug recipients, 2:1). Among 371 patients, the clinical cure rates associated with linezolid and the comparators were statistically equivalent overall (81% vs. 71%, respectively) but were significantly higher for linezolid-treated patients with infected foot ulcers (81% vs. 68%; P=.018) and for patients without osteomyelitis (87% vs. 72%; P=.003). Cure rates were comparable for inpatients and outpatients and for both oral and intravenous formulations. Drug-related adverse events were significantly more common in the linezolid group, but they were generally mild and reversible. Linezolid was at least as effective as aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors for treating foot infections in diabetic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14679443     DOI: 10.1086/380449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  47 in total

Review 1.  Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Diabetic foot infections: stepwise medical and surgical management.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Antimicrobial therapy for bone and joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Andreas Ambrosch; Simone Haefner; Edward Jude; Ralf Lobmann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Management of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fran Game
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 6.  MRSA and diabetic foot wounds: contaminating or infecting organisms?

Authors:  Frank L Bowling; Edward B Jude; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein to monitor treatment outcomes in diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Suzanne Av van Asten; Daniel C Jupiter; Moez Mithani; Javier La Fontaine; Kathryn E Davis; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  From ulcer to infection: an update on clinical practice and adjunctive treatments of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  C Abad; N Safdar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Efficacy and safety of neutral pH superoxidised solution in severe diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Fermín R Martínez-De Jesús; Antonio Ramos-De la Medina; José María Remes-Troche; David G Armstrong; Stephanie C Wu; Jose Luis Lázaro Martínez; Juan V Beneit-Montesinos
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  The treatment of diabetic foot infections: focus on ertapenem.

Authors:  Michael Edmonds
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.