Literature DB >> 14679273

Screening for proteinuria in US adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

L Ebony Boulware1, Bernard G Jaar, Michelle E Tarver-Carr, Frederick L Brancati, Neil R Powe.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Chronic kidney disease is a growing public health problem. Screening for early identification could improve health but could also lead to unnecessary harms and excess costs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of periodic, population-based dipstick screening for early detection of urine protein in adults with neither hypertension nor diabetes and in adults with hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov decision analytic model to compare a strategy of annual screening with no screening (usual care) for proteinuria at age 50 years followed by treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
RESULTS: For persons with neither hypertension nor diabetes, the cost-effectiveness ratio for screening vs no screening (usual care) was unfavorable (282 818 dollars per QALY; incremental cost of 616 dollars and a gain of 0.0022 QALYs per person). However, screening such persons beginning at age 60 years yielded a more favorable ratio (53 372 dollars per QALY). For persons with hypertension, the ratio was highly favorable (18 621 dollars per QALY; incremental cost of 476 dollars and a gain of 0.03 QALYs per person). Cost-effectiveness was mediated by both chronic kidney disease progression and death prevention benefits of ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy. Influential parameters that might make screening for the general population more cost-effective include a greater incidence of proteinuria, age at screening (53 372 dollars per QALY for persons beginning screening at age 60 years), or lower frequency of screening (every 10 years: 80 700 dollars per QALY at age 50 years; 6195 dollars per QALY at age 60 years; and 5486 dollars per QALY at age 70 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of urine protein to slow progression of chronic kidney disease and decrease mortality is not cost-effective unless selectively directed toward high-risk groups (older persons and persons with hypertension) or conducted at an infrequent interval of 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14679273     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.23.3101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  97 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of chronic kidney disease mass screening test in Japan.

Authors:  Masahide Kondo; Kunihiro Yamagata; Shu-ling Hoshi; Chie Saito; Koichi Asahi; Toshiki Moriyama; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Hideaki Yoshida; Kunitoshi Iseki; Tsuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Kidney Health for Everyone Everywhere - From Prevention to Detection and Equitable Access to Care.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Guillermo Garcia-Garcia; Siu-Fai Lui; Sharon Andreoli; Winston Wing-Shing Fung; Anne Hradsky; Latha Kumaraswami; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Ziyoda Rakhimova; Gamal Saadi; Luisa Strani; Ifeoma Ulasi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-11

3.  Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in US adults with undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Deidra C Crews; Josef Coresh; Edgar R Miller; Rajiv Saran; Jerry Yee; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Meda Pavkov; Mark S Eberhardt; Desmond E Williams; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Peter D Jacobson; Jennifer A Palmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Qi Zhang; Sydney E S Brown; Melinda L Drum; David O Meltzer; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The costs and benefits of automatic estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting.

Authors:  Julia R den Hartog; Peter P Reese; Borut Cizman; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Population-based screening for CKD.

Authors:  Neil R Powe; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Screening for CKD with eGFR: doubts and dangers.

Authors:  Richard J Glassock; Christopher Winearls
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Early Detection of CKD: Implications for Low-Income, Middle-Income, and High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; James A Dickinson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Heart rate as a risk factor for developing chronic kidney disease: longitudinal analysis of a screened cohort.

Authors:  Taku Inoue; Kunitoshi Iseki; Chiho Iseki; Yusuke Ohya; Kozen Kinjo; Shuichi Takishita
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.