Literature DB >> 14678917

Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease.

Charles A Henrikson1, Eric E Howell, David E Bush, J Shawn Miles, Glenn R Meininger, Tracy Friedlander, Andrew C Bushnell, Nisha Chandra-Strobos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The belief that chest pain relief with nitroglycerin indicates the presence of active coronary artery disease is common. However, this hypothesis has not been tested.
OBJECTIVE: To define the diagnostic and prognostic value of chest pain relief with nitroglycerin.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: Urban community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 459 consecutive patients with chest pain admitted through the emergency department who received nitroglycerin from emergency services personnel or an emergency department nurse. Follow-up was obtained by telephone contact at 4 months. MEASUREMENTS: Chest pain relief was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in patients' self-reported pain within 5 minutes of the initial dose of sublingual or spray nitroglycerin. Active coronary artery disease was defined as any elevated serum enzyme levels, coronary angiography demonstrating a 70% or greater stenosis, or a positive exercise test result.
RESULTS: Nitroglycerin relieved chest pain in 39% of patients (181 of 459). In patients with active coronary artery disease as the likely cause of their chest pain, 35% (49 of 141) had chest pain relief with nitroglycerin. In contrast, in patients without active coronary artery disease, 41% (113 of 275) had chest pain relief (P > 0.2). Four-month clinical outcomes were similar in patients with or without chest pain relief with nitroglycerin (P > 0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, in a general population admitted for chest pain, relief of pain after nitroglycerin treatment does not predict active coronary artery disease and should not be used to guide diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14678917     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  7 in total

1.  [Benefits and risks of nitrate preparations in the treatment of angina pectoris].

Authors:  S Rosenkranz; E Erdmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  [Acute chest pain].

Authors:  K Kurz; H A Katus; E Giannitsis
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  MicroRNA-208a: a Good Diagnostic Marker and a Predictor of no-Reflow in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneuos Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Aboubakr Mohamed Salama; Wael Ali Khalil; Manar Al-Zaky; Somia Hassan Abdallah; Nader Talaat Kandil; Ahmed Abdelsabour; Ahmed Mohammed Shaker; Mesbah Taha Hasanein; Giovanni Battista Luciani; Hassan M E Azzazy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Deborah B Diercks; J Douglas Kirk
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  The clinics of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Gianfranco Cervellin; Gianni Rastelli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

7.  An unusual cause of chest pain.

Authors:  J V Pope; S A Grossman; L K Kulchycki; C Fischer; J Edlow
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.397

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.