Literature DB >> 14678486

Moving forward with chemical mutagenesis in the mouse.

Timothy P O'Brien1, Wayne N Frankel.   

Abstract

The study of genetic variation in mice offers a powerful experimental platform for understanding gene function. Complex trait analysis, gene-targeting and gene-trapping technologies, as well as insertional and chemical mutagenesis approaches are becoming increasingly sophisticated and provide a variety of options for cataloguing gene activities and interactions. In this review we discuss fundamental and practical concepts related to chemical mutagenesis and we highlight the growing list of strategies for performing mutagenesis screens in mice. Gene-driven and diverse types of phenotype-driven screens provide several options for the recovery of the invaluable variety of alleles generated by chemical mutagenesis. The unique advantages offered using chemical mutagenesis compare favourably to and complement the spectrum of approaches available for functional annotation of the mammalian genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14678486      PMCID: PMC1664738          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  48 in total

1.  N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of a 6- to 11-cM subregion of the Fah-Hbb interval of mouse chromosome 7: Completed testing of 4557 gametes and deletion mapping and complementation analysis of 31 mutations.

Authors:  E M Rinchik; D A Carpenter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Developing genetic reagents to facilitate recovery, analysis, and maintenance of mouse mutations.

Authors:  E M Rinchik
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Genetic dissection of complex and quantitative traits: from fantasy to reality via a community effort.

Authors:  David W Threadgill; Kent W Hunter; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Genotype-based screen for ENU-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Y Chen; D Yee; K Dains; A Chatterjee; J Cavalcoli; E Schneider; J Om; R P Woychik; T Magnuson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A phenotype-based screen for embryonic lethal mutations in the mouse.

Authors:  A Kasarskis; K Manova; K V Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Engineering a mouse balancer chromosome.

Authors:  B Zheng; M Sage; W W Cai; D M Thompson; B C Tavsanli; Y C Cheah; A Bradley
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains.

Authors:  M J Justice; D A Carpenter; J Favor; A Neuhauser-Klaus; M Hrabé de Angelis; D Soewarto; A Moser; S Cordes; D Miller; V Chapman; J S Weber; E M Rinchik; P R Hunsicker; W L Russell; V C Bode
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  J W Thomas; C LaMantia; T Magnuson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Mouse ENU mutagenesis.

Authors:  M J Justice; J K Noveroske; J S Weber; B Zheng; A Bradley
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Mouse mutants from chemically mutagenized embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  R J Munroe; R A Bergstrom; Q Y Zheng; B Libby; R Smith; S W John; K J Schimenti; V L Browning; J C Schimenti
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  12 in total

1.  Physiological genomics: tools and concepts.

Authors:  Allen W Cowley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A method for the rapid automated assessment of olfactory function.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Identification of a rat model for usher syndrome type 1B by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis-driven forward genetics.

Authors:  Bart M G Smits; Theo A Peters; Joram D Mul; Huib J Croes; Jack A M Fransen; Andy J Beynon; Victor Guryev; Ronald H A Plasterk; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  ENU mutation mapped to a distal region of chromosome 11 is a major determinant of bone size.

Authors:  Bouchra Edderkaoui; Chandrasekhar Kesavan; David J Baylink; Jon E Wergedal; Apurva K Srivastava; Subburaman Mohan
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Creating a "hopeful monster": mouse forward genetic screens.

Authors:  Vanessa L Horner; Tamara Caspary
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 6.  High throughput sequencing approaches to mutation discovery in the mouse.

Authors:  Michelle M Simon; Ann-Marie Mallon; Gareth R Howell; Laura G Reinholdt
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Biologia futura: animal testing in drug development-the past, the present and the future.

Authors:  Miklós Sántha
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Neurobehavioral mutants identified in an ENU-mutagenesis project.

Authors:  Melloni N Cook; Jonathan P Dunning; Ronald G Wiley; Elissa J Chesler; Dabney K Johnson; Darla R Miller; Dan Goldowitz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Understanding mammalian genetic systems: the challenge of phenotyping in the mouse.

Authors:  Steve D M Brown; John M Hancock; Hilary Gates
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Using microarrays to facilitate positional cloning: identification of tomosyn as an inhibitor of neurosecretion.

Authors:  Michael Dybbs; John Ngai; Joshua M Kaplan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.