Literature DB >> 14678367

A randomized trial of choice of treatment in prostate cancer: the effect of intervention on the treatment chosen.

A Auvinen1, M Hakama, M Ala-Opas, T Vornanen, M Leppilahti, P Salminen, T L J Tammela.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether different approaches in the choice of treatment affect the treatment chosen by the patient for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial with 210 men who had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1993-94 at four major hospitals in Finland. After obtaining informed consent the men were randomized either to an intervention arm, in which there was greater patient participation in the choice of treatment following a structured procedure, or a control arm in which the standard approach, i.e. a standardized treatment protocol, was used. The main outcome measure of the analysis was the primary treatment chosen for prostate cancer.
RESULTS: In the enhanced participation arm patients not eligible for radical prostatectomy chose orchidectomy less frequently and favoured nonsurgical endocrine treatment than in the treatment protocol arm. Radical prostatectomy was the most commonly chosen treatment option in both arms among men with operable cancer. The way treatment options were presented affected the treatment chosen for prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION: Patients with prostate cancer are willing and able to take an active role in making decisions. The preferences of patients with prostate cancer in the choice of treatment may differ from the priorities of the physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14678367     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04554.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

Review 1.  The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Emma Turner; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Effect of intervention on decision making of treatment for disease progression, prostate-specific antigen biochemical failure and prostate cancer death.

Authors:  Rex C-C Huang; Anssi Auvinen; Matti Hakama; Teuvo L J Tammela; Martti Ala-Opas; Mikael Leppilahti; Timo Vornanen; Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Shared decision making in cancer screening and treatment decisions for American Indian and Alaska native communities: can we ethically calibrate interventions to patients' values?

Authors:  Katherine E Nowakowski; Jon C Tilburt; Judith S Kaur
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Kristina Demas Woodhouse; Katie Tremont; Anil Vachani; Marilyn M Schapira; Neha Vapiwala; Charles B Simone; Abigail T Berman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Improving the communication of benefits and harms of treatment strategies: decision AIDS for localized prostate cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

6.  The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Barbara Halpenny; Fangxin Hong; Seth Wolpin; William B Lober; Kenneth J Russell; William J Ellis; Usha Govindarajulu; Jaclyn Bosco; B Joyce Davison; Gerald Bennett; Martha K Terris; Andrea Barsevick; Daniel W Lin; Claire C Yang; Greg Swanson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 7.  Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Peter McCulloch; Andrew J Carr; W Bruce Campbell; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  A systematic review of information in decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kathryn McIssac; Joan Austoker; Agathe Charvet; Paul Hewitson; Karen R Sepucha; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1).

Authors:  Maria J Schymura; Amy R Kahn; Robert R German; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Rosemary D Cress; Jack L Finch; John P Fulton; Tiefu Shen; Erik Stuckart
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Shared decision-making and comparative effectiveness research for patients with chronic conditions: an urgent synergy for better health.

Authors:  Michael R Gionfriddo; Aaron L Leppin; Juan P Brito; Annie Leblanc; Nilay D Shah; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.