INTRODUCTION: The incidence and characteristics of dissociated arrhythmia confined to the pulmonary vein (PV) following disconnection have not been described in a large number of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective study of 152 patients (29 female, mean age 51 +/- 11 years) referred for catheter ablation of drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Following ostial ablation, the rate and regularity of any dissociated venous activity was analyzed with and without isoproterenol infusion (to achieve a heart rate of 120-140 beats/min). Patients then were classified according to their venous dissociated activity. Group 1 consisted of patients in whom the dissociated PV spike had a slow rhythm >1,200 ms. Group 2 consisted of patients with spontaneous repetitive dissociated discharges confined in the vein with a cycle length <400 ms. A total of 384 PVs were ablated in 152 patients. Disappearance of all venous potentials was observed in 88% of the treated veins; at least one dissociated venous potential was observed in the remaining 12%. Group 1 activity was seen more often than group 2 (23 patients, mean cycle length 2,300 +/- 1,100 ms vs 13 patients, mean cycle length 179 +/- 77 ms). Dissociated PV arrhythmia was seen most often in the right superior PV (19%). CONCLUSION: Dissociation as the endpoint of PV disconnection was observed in 12% of PVs. Due to the capricious nature of this activity, the actual incidence is almost certainly higher. The dissociated venous rhythm usually is slow and, less commonly, is rapid and repetitive.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence and characteristics of dissociated arrhythmia confined to the pulmonary vein (PV) following disconnection have not been described in a large number of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective study of 152 patients (29 female, mean age 51 +/- 11 years) referred for catheter ablation of drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Following ostial ablation, the rate and regularity of any dissociated venous activity was analyzed with and without isoproterenol infusion (to achieve a heart rate of 120-140 beats/min). Patients then were classified according to their venous dissociated activity. Group 1 consisted of patients in whom the dissociated PV spike had a slow rhythm >1,200 ms. Group 2 consisted of patients with spontaneous repetitive dissociated discharges confined in the vein with a cycle length <400 ms. A total of 384 PVs were ablated in 152 patients. Disappearance of all venous potentials was observed in 88% of the treated veins; at least one dissociated venous potential was observed in the remaining 12%. Group 1 activity was seen more often than group 2 (23 patients, mean cycle length 2,300 +/- 1,100 ms vs 13 patients, mean cycle length 179 +/- 77 ms). Dissociated PV arrhythmia was seen most often in the right superior PV (19%). CONCLUSION: Dissociation as the endpoint of PV disconnection was observed in 12% of PVs. Due to the capricious nature of this activity, the actual incidence is almost certainly higher. The dissociated venous rhythm usually is slow and, less commonly, is rapid and repetitive.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Cristina Tutuianu; Vassil Traykov; Gábor Bencsik; Gergely Klausz; László Sághy; Robert Pap Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214