Literature DB >> 14677851

Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep.

S Avendaño1, B Villanueva, J A Woolliams.   

Abstract

The expected benefits from optimized selection in real livestock populations were evaluated by applying dynamic selection algorithms to two livestock populations of sheep (Meatlinc) and beef cattle (Aberdeen Angus). In addition, the effects of introducing BLUP evaluations on the population structure, genetic gain, and inbreeding were investigated. The use of BLUP-EBV accelerated the rates of gain in the Meatlinc, but the effects of BLUP evaluations on Aberdeen Angus are not as evident. Although steady increases in the average coefficient of inbreeding (F) were observed, the inbreeding rates (deltaF) before and after the introduction of BLUP evaluations were not significantly different. The observed deltaF in the last generation was 1.0% for Meatlinc and 0.2% for Aberdeen Angus. The application of the dynamic selection algorithms for maximizing genetic gain at a fixed deltaF led to important expected increases in the rate of genetic gain (deltaG). When deltaF was restricted to the value observed in both populations, increments per year in deltaG of 4.6 (i.e., 17%) index units for Meatlinc and 3.5 (i.e., 30%) index units for Aberdeen Angus were found in comparison to the deltaG expected from conventional truncation BLUP selection. More relaxed constraints on deltaF allowed even higher expected increases in deltaG in both populations. This study demonstrates that the optimization tools constitute a potentially highly effective way of managing gain and inbreeding under a broad range of schemes in terms of scale and inbreeding level. No losses in genetic gain were associated with the use of dynamic optimization selection when schemes were compared at the same deltaF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14677851     DOI: 10.2527/2003.81122964x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Optimum contribution selection in large general tree breeding populations with an application to Scots pine.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome-wide estimates of coancestry, inbreeding and effective population size in the Spanish Holstein population.

Authors:  Silvia Teresa Rodríguez-Ramilo; Jesús Fernández; Miguel Angel Toro; Delfino Hernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Using the Animal Model to Accelerate Response to Selection in a Self-Pollinating Crop.

Authors:  Wallace A Cowling; Katia T Stefanova; Cameron P Beeck; Matthew N Nelson; Bonnie L W Hargreaves; Olaf Sass; Arthur R Gilmour; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Genetic parameters and selection response for the harvest body weight of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in a breeding program in China.

Authors:  Juan Sui; Sheng Luan; Guoliang Yang; Zhenglong Xia; Kun Luo; Qiongying Tang; Xia Lu; Xianhong Meng; Jie Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Challenges and opportunities in genetic improvement of local livestock breeds.

Authors:  Filippo Biscarini; Ezequiel L Nicolazzi; Alessandra Stella; Paul J Boettcher; Gustavo Gandini
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  A fast Newton-Raphson based iterative algorithm for large scale optimal contribution selection.

Authors:  Binyam S Dagnachew; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Selective advantage of implementing optimal contributions selection and timescales for the convergence of long-term genetic contributions.

Authors:  David M Howard; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Pieter W Knap; Valentin D Kremer; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.