BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension (EHT) is a major cardiovascular risk factor, and the additional presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) increases this risk. However, although the sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of EHT is known to play a role in cardiovascular risk, the level of sympathetic nerve activity is known neither in DM2 nor in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients (EHT+DM2). Therefore, we planned to quantify the vasoconstrictor sympathetic nerve activity in patients with EHT+DM2 and with DM2 relative to that in matched groups with EHT and normal blood pressure (NT). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 68 closely matched subjects with EHT+DM2 (n=17), DM2 (n=17), EHT (n=17), and NT (n=17), we measured resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity as the mean frequency of multiunit bursts (MSNA) and of single units (s-MSNA) with defined vasoconstrictor properties. The s-MSNA in EHT+DM2 (97+/-3.8 impulses/100 beats) was greater (at least P<0.001) than in EHT (69+/-3.4 impulses/100 beats) and DM2 (78+/-4.1 impulses/100 beats), and all these were significantly greater (at least P<0.01) than in NT (53+/-3.3 impulses/100 beats) despite similar age and body mass index. The MSNA followed a similar trend. In addition, the level of insulin was also raised in EHT+DM2 (20.4+/-3.6 microU/mL) and DM2 (18.1+/-3.1 microU/mL; at least P<0.05) compared with HT or NT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EHT+DM2, EHT, or DM2 had central sympathetic hyperactivity, although plasma insulin levels were raised only in EHT+DM2 and DM2. The combination of EHT and DM2 resulted in the greatest sympathetic hyperactivity and level of plasma insulin, and this hyperactivity could constitute a mechanism for the increased risks of this condition.
BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension (EHT) is a major cardiovascular risk factor, and the additional presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) increases this risk. However, although the sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of EHT is known to play a role in cardiovascular risk, the level of sympathetic nerve activity is known neither in DM2 nor in hypertensive type 2 diabeticpatients (EHT+DM2). Therefore, we planned to quantify the vasoconstrictor sympathetic nerve activity in patients with EHT+DM2 and with DM2 relative to that in matched groups with EHT and normal blood pressure (NT). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 68 closely matched subjects with EHT+DM2 (n=17), DM2 (n=17), EHT (n=17), and NT (n=17), we measured resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity as the mean frequency of multiunit bursts (MSNA) and of single units (s-MSNA) with defined vasoconstrictor properties. The s-MSNA in EHT+DM2 (97+/-3.8 impulses/100 beats) was greater (at least P<0.001) than in EHT (69+/-3.4 impulses/100 beats) and DM2 (78+/-4.1 impulses/100 beats), and all these were significantly greater (at least P<0.01) than in NT (53+/-3.3 impulses/100 beats) despite similar age and body mass index. The MSNA followed a similar trend. In addition, the level of insulin was also raised in EHT+DM2 (20.4+/-3.6 microU/mL) and DM2 (18.1+/-3.1 microU/mL; at least P<0.05) compared with HT or NT. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with EHT+DM2, EHT, or DM2 had central sympathetic hyperactivity, although plasma insulin levels were raised only in EHT+DM2 and DM2. The combination of EHT and DM2 resulted in the greatest sympathetic hyperactivity and level of plasma insulin, and this hyperactivity could constitute a mechanism for the increased risks of this condition.
Authors: Ann-Katrin Grotle; Charles K Crawford; Yu Huo; Kai M Ybarbo; Michelle L Harrison; James Graham; Kimber L Stanhope; Peter J Havel; Paul J Fadel; Audrey J Stone Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michael Böhm; Sebastian Ewen; Dominik Linz; Jan-C Reil; Stephan Schirmer; Christian Ukena; Felix Mahfoud Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.132