Literature DB >> 14675704

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Cosimo Sperti1, Claudio Pasquali, Franca Chierichetti, Andrea Ferronato, Giandomenico Decet, Sergio Pedrazzoli.   

Abstract

The prediction of survival of patients with pancreatic cancer is usually based on tumor staging and grading and on the level of tumor markers. However, accurate tumor staging can be obtained only after resection, and still there is a great difference in survival rates among patients with the same clinicopathologic parameters. Recently the uptake of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) by positron emission tomography (PET) has been found to be correlated with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the role of 18FDG PET as a prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer. From June 1996 to July 2002, a total of 118 patients underwent PET for pancreatic cancer. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18FDG was calculated in 60 of them, and these patients were divided into high (>4) and low (< or =4) SUV groups. They were also evaluated according to the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification system of the International Union Against Cancer, and by tumor grade, medical or surgical treatment, diabetes, age, sex, and CA 19-9 serum levels. Twenty-nine cancers showed high and 31 showed low SUVs. Survival was significantly influenced by tumor stage (P=0.0001), tumor grade (P=0.01), and SUV (P=0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that only stage (P=0.001) and SUV (P=0.0002) were independent predictors of survival. When patients who were analyzed for SUV were stratified according to the other variables, FDG uptake was related to survival also after stratification for the following: stage III to IVa (P=0.002), stage IVb (P=0.01), tumor resection (P=0.006), moderately differentiated tumors (P=0.01), age less than 65 years (P=0.006), CA 19-9 levels greater than 300 kU/L (P=0.002), and absence of diabetes (P=0.0001). The SUV calculated with 18FDG PET is an important prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer and may be useful in selecting patients for therapeutic management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14675704     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  25 in total

Review 1.  Detection and prognostic impact of disseminated tumor cells in pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Ilka Vogel; Holger Kalthoff; Doris Henne-Bruns; Bernd Kremer
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Prognostic predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  B Nakata; S Nishimura; T Ishikawa; M Ohira; H Nishino; J Kawabe; H Ochi; K Hirakawa
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging: a method to assess the proliferative activity of human cancer in vivo. Comparison with DNA flow cytometry in head and neck tumors.

Authors:  H Minn; H Joensuu; A Ahonen; P Klemi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  The role of nuclear medicine in the evaluation of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  R L van Heertum; R A Fawwaz
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Prediction of survival in glioma patients by means of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  N J Patronas; G Di Chiro; C Kufta; D Bairamian; P L Kornblith; R Simon; S M Larson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B Nakata; Y S Chung; S Nishimura; T Nishihara; Y Sakurai; T Sawada; T Okamura; J Kawabe; H Ochi; M Sowa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Increased glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  N Schek; B L Hall; O J Finn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Does FDG uptake measure proliferative activity of human cancer cells? In vitro comparison with DNA flow cytometry and tritiated thymidine uptake.

Authors:  K Higashi; A C Clavo; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  CA 19-9 as a prognostic index after resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C Sperti; C Pasquali; S Catalini; F Cappellazzo; B Bonadimani; R Behboo; S Pedrazzoli
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  FDG-PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study.

Authors:  N R Maisey; A Webb; G D Flux; A Padhani; D C Cunningham; R J Ott; A Norman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  27 in total

1.  FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jun-Qiang Chen; Jin-Lu Liu; Xin-Gan Qin; Yuan Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  PET imaging of inflammation and adenocarcinoma xenografts using vascular adhesion protein 1 targeting peptide 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1: comparison with 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Anu Autio; Tiina Ujula; Pauliina Luoto; Satu Salomäki; Sirpa Jalkanen; Anne Roivainen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  GLUT-1 expression in pancreatic neoplasia: implications in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Rajendra Singh; Ecmel Kaygusuz; Serdar Balci; Nevra Dursun; Nil Culhaci; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Wang; Feng Yang; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prognostic indicators in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing total pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Shimpei Maeda; Kyohei Ariake; Masahiro Iseki; Hideo Ohtsuka; Masamichi Mizuma; Kei Nakagawa; Takanori Morikawa; Hiroki Hayashi; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Takashi Kamei; Takeshi Naitoh; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Preoperative 18F-FDG uptake is strongly correlated with malignancy, Weiss score, and molecular markers of aggressiveness in adrenal cortical tumors.

Authors:  Lucile Gust; David Taieb; Arnault Beliard; Anne Barlier; Isabelle Morange; Catherine de Micco; Jean-François Henry; Frederic Sebag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Tumor relapse after pancreatic cancer resection is detected earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT.

Authors:  Cosimo Sperti; Claudio Pasquali; Sergio Bissoli; Franca Chierichetti; Guido Liessi; Sergio Pedrazzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Diagnostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with reference to the World Health Organization classification.

Authors:  Toshihiko Masui; Ryuichiro Doi; Tatsuo Ito; Kazuhiro Kami; Kohei Ogawa; Daisuke Harada; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bethany B Barone; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Claire F Snyder; Kimberly S Peairs; Kelly B Stein; Rachel L Derr; Antonio C Wolff; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Dual-phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Tatsuya Higashi; Yuji Nakamoto; Koji Fujimoto; Ryuichiro Doi; Masayuki Imamura; Tsuneo Saga
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.