Literature DB >> 14675670

Cytokeratin staining of resected lymph nodes may improve the sensitivity of surgical staging for endometrial cancer.

Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet1, Gary L Keeney, Andrea Mariani, Maurice J Webb, William A Cliby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The presence of metastases to regional lymph nodes (LN) is the single most important risk factor in endometrial cancer. Advances in molecular biology have provided more sensitive methods for detecting micrometastasis. This was a pilot study to determine whether cytokeratin staining of LN from endometrial cancer patients is more sensitive than traditional histopathologic evaluation for the detection of micrometastasis.
METHODS: The inclusion criteria included patients with surgical stage I-II endometrial cancer having >50% myometrial invasion, lesions >2 cm, and negative LN together with one of the following: FIGO grade 3 or cervical or lymph-vascular involvement. A matched control group included patients with LN metastasis. The evaluation of the LN at the time of initial surgery consisted of a frozen section and a reevaluation on permanent sections with H&E. In the study, lymphadenectomy specimens were cut, stained again with H&E and with cytokeratin, and examined. Cytokeratin staining was performed with AE1/AE3 antibodies. There were 16 LN-negative cases and 9 LN-positive controls.
RESULTS: There was complete agreement between the LN assessment at time of surgery and the study H&E review prior to the staining for cytokeratin. However, 2 LN-negative cases (12.5%) had micrometastasis by cytokeratin staining. One of these patients developed recurrent disease in the para-aortic LN and died of disease at 2.8 years.
CONCLUSION: Cytokeratin staining may improve the sensitivity for detection of metastasis compared to traditional evaluation. This study strongly suggests that these micrometastasis are clinically significant. An approach incorporating cytokeratin analysis could improve the risk assessment of specific patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14675670     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Ultrastaging of negative pelvic lymph nodes to decrease the true prevalence of isolated paraaortic dissemination in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Multinu; Jvan Casarin; Serena Cappuccio; Gary L Keeney; Gretchen E Glaser; William A Cliby; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Stefano Angioni; Gavino Faa; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?

Authors:  Nina Bassarak; Thomas Blankenstein; Ansgar Brüning; Darius Dian; Florian Bergauer; Klaus Friese; Ioannis Mylonas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a selective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion.

Authors:  Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson; Jen Ducie; Narisha Ali; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Giorgio Bogani; William A Cliby; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Andrea Mariani; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Christine H Kim; Robert A Soslow; Kay J Park; Emma L Barber; Fady Khoury-Collado; Joyce N Barlin; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  The expression of HSP60 and HSP10 in large bowel carcinomas with lymph node metastase.

Authors:  Francesco Cappello; Sabrina David; Francesca Rappa; Fabio Bucchieri; Lorenzo Marasà; Tommaso E Bartolotta; Felicia Farina; Giovanni Zummo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in regional lymph nodes in stage I to II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yukiharu Todo; Hidenori Kato; Kazuhira Okamoto; Shinichiro Minobe; Katsushige Yamashiro; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 7.  Cytokeratin Expression Pattern in Human Endometrial Carcinomas and Lymph Nodes Micrometastasis: a Mini-review.

Authors:  Danuta Vasilevska; Vilius Rudaitis; Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Dorota Lewkowicz; Dominika Vasilevska; Andrzej Semczuk
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Ultrastaging of lymph node in uterine cancers.

Authors:  Corinne Bézu; Charles Coutant; Marcos Ballester; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Roman Rouzier; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-21

9.  Accuracy of a nomogram for prediction of lymph-node metastasis detected with conventional histopathology and ultrastaging in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  M Koskas; E Chereau; M Ballester; G Dubernard; F Lécuru; D Heitz; P Mathevet; H Marret; D Querleu; F Golfier; E Leblanc; D Luton; R Rouzier; E Daraï
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparative assessment of lymph node micrometastasis in cervical, endometrial and vulvar cancer: insights on the real time qRT-PCR approach versus immunohistochemistry, employing dual molecular markers.

Authors:  Kalliopi I Pappa; Alexandros Rodolakis; Ioanna Christodoulou; Maria Gazouli; Sofia Markaki; Aris Antsaklis; Nicholas P Anagnou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.