Literature DB >> 1467524

Distinctive immunophenotypic features of t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloblastic leukemia in children.

C A Hurwitz1, S C Raimondi, D Head, R Krance, J Mirro, D K Kalwinsky, G D Ayers, F G Behm.   

Abstract

Thirty cases of newly diagnosed pediatric acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) with French-American-British (FAB) M2 morphology were analyzed with cytogenetics and a comprehensive panel of monoclonal antibodies reactive with lymphoid-, natural killer (NK)-cell-, and myeloid-associated antigens. The t(8;21)(q22;q22), or t(8;21;V)(q22;q22;V), translocation was identified in 16 of the 30 cases. Cases with the t(8;21) did not differ significantly from the remaining M2 cases with respect to expression of CD11b, CD13, CD14, CD15, CD33, CD34, CD36, CD41a, CD42b, CDw65, TdT, or HLA-DR. Expression of the B-cell antigen CD19 was detected in 13 of the 16 t(8;21) cases (81%), but in only 1 of the 14 (7%) other M2 cases (P = .00006). Expression of the CD56 NK-cell antigen was also significantly more frequent among t(8;21) cases (63% v 14%; P = .01). Coexpression of CD19 and CD56 was found only in the t(8;21) group (9 of 16 cases, P = .0009). Furthermore, this phenotype was not found in 48 evaluable cases of de novo AML of the FAB M1, M3, M4, M5, or M7 subtypes. The 14 M2 AML cases lacking the t(8;21) commonly expressed CD2 (n = 5) or CD7 (n = 8). However, no case with the t(8;21) expressed either antigen (P = .01 and .0005, respectively). Thus, the t(8;21) biologic subgroup of pediatric M2 AML has distinct immunophenotypic characteristics that distinguish it from other types of de novo AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1467524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  10 in total

1.  Flow cytometric analysis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia in childhood: report from the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group.

Authors:  Hideaki Ohta; Shotaro Iwamoto; Nobutaka Kiyokawa; Masahito Tsurusawa; Takao Deguchi; Kozo Takase; Junichiro Fujimoto; Keizo Horibe; Yoshihiro Komada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes.

Authors:  J J M van Dongen; L Lhermitte; S Böttcher; J Almeida; V H J van der Velden; J Flores-Montero; A Rawstron; V Asnafi; Q Lécrevisse; P Lucio; E Mejstrikova; T Szczepański; T Kalina; R de Tute; M Brüggemann; L Sedek; M Cullen; A W Langerak; A Mendonça; E Macintyre; M Martin-Ayuso; O Hrusak; M B Vidriales; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  The application of molecular analyses for primary granulocytic sarcoma with a specific chromosomal translocation.

Authors:  Naohiro Sekiguchi; Takashi Watanabe; Yukio Kobayashi; Chiho Inokuchi; Sung-Won Kim; Yukiko Yokota; Kazuki Tanimoto; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Kensei Tobinai
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Blast phenotype and comutations in acute myeloid leukemia with mutated NPM1 influence disease biology and outcome.

Authors:  Emily F Mason; Robert P Hasserjian; Nidhi Aggarwal; Adam C Seegmiller; Olga Pozdnyakova
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

5.  Significant association between expression of the CD11b surface molecule and favorable outcome for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Zahra Amirghofran; Maryam Zakerinia; Azra Shamseddin
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Contribution of immunophenotypic and genotypic analyses to the diagnosis of acute leukemia.

Authors:  R Stasi; C G Taylor; A Venditti; G Del Poeta; G Aronica; C Bastianelli; M D Simone; F Buccisano; M C Cox; A Bruno
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Neural cell-adhesion molecule (CD 56)-positive, t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML, M-2) and granulocytic sarcoma.

Authors:  K Krishnan; C W Ross; P T Adams; A Pereira; M S Roth
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.673

8.  Correlation Analysis and Prognostic Impacts of Biological Characteristics in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Fengli Li; Na Li; Anyou Wang; Xin Liu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Phenotype in combination with genotype improves outcome prediction in acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children's Oncology Group protocol AAML0531.

Authors:  Andrew P Voigt; Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Andrew J Menssen; Elisabeth R Wilson; Samir Kahwash; Susana C Raimondi; Betsy A Hirsch; Alan S Gamis; Soheil Meshinchi; Denise A Wells; Michael R Loken
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Immortalization of human AE pre-leukemia cells by hTERT allows leukemic transformation.

Authors:  Shan Lin; Junping Wei; Mark Wunderlich; Fu-Sheng Chou; James C Mulloy
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.