Literature DB >> 14674974

Results and costs of intensive care in a tertiary university hospital from 1996-2000.

I Parviainen1, A Herranen, A Holm, A Uusaro, E Ruokonen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Costs of intensive care may be 20% of all hospital costs. Population aging likely increases the demand for intensive care services, while health care has financial limitations. Therefore data about outcome and costs of intensive care are needed. We studied changes in patient characteristics, outcome, intensity of care and costs of intensive care in a tertiary university hospital in Finland.
METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively data of patients admitted to the ICU between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2000 using the patient data management system. Postoperative and ICU patients were analyzed separately. Data included age, Apache II score, cause of intensive care admission, length and intensity of ICU care. ICU, hospital and 6-month mortality were analyzed. Intensity of care was assessed by TISS points and the annual costs of intensive care were evaluated.
RESULTS: The number of ICU admissions from 1996-2000 was 11,323. The proportions of ICU and postoperative patients were 39% and 61%, respectively. The mean age of the patients did not change. The mean Apache II score increased over time both in the ICU and postoperative patients. There was no change in crude hospital mortality. Total ICU costs decreased from 8,660,000 euros (in 1997) to 7,480,000 euros (in 2000). In the ICU patients, the costs of hospital survival decreased towards the end of the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: We treated more severely ill patients with unchanged outcome but at lower costs towards the end of the study period. Costs of intensive care are not necessarily increasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14674974     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  4 in total

1.  [Analysis of personnel costs after reorganization of intensive care using calculated diagnosis-related groups comparative data. An investigation at the Charité Berlin].

Authors:  J P Braun; B Schwilk; L Kuntz; M Kastrup; U Frei; D Schmidt; B Behrends; A Schleppers; U Kaisers; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Peer reviewing critical care: a pragmatic approach to quality management.

Authors:  Jan-Peter Braun; Hanswerner Bause; Frank Bloos; Götz Geldner; Marc Kastrup; Ralf Kuhlen; Andreas Markewitz; Jörg Martin; Hendrik Mende; Michael Quintel; Klaus Steinmeier-Bauer; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-08

3.  A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units.

Authors:  Onnen Moerer; Enno Plock; Uchenna Mgbor; Alexandra Schmid; Heinz Schneider; Manfred Bernd Wischnewsky; Hilmar Burchardi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients failing non-invasive ventilation--a cost analysis.

Authors:  Stephan Braune; Hilmar Burchardi; Markus Engel; Axel Nierhaus; Henning Ebelt; Maria Metschke; Simone Rosseau; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.