Heather Stuart1. 1. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Abramsky Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6. hh11@post.queensu.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a media intervention designed to improve one newspaper's portrayal of mental illnesses, specifically, schizophrenia. The project was part of an international antistigma program, Open the Doors, organized by the World Psychiatric Association. METHODS: The media intervention attempted to influence news content directly by providing reporters with more accurate background information and helping them develop more positive story lines. The evaluation compared story content and length over a 24-month period: 8 months prior to the antistigma intervention and 16 months postintervention. RESULTS: Positive stories outnumbered negative stories by a factor of 2 in both pre- and postperiods. Positive mental health stories increased by 33% in the postintervention period and their word count increased by an average of 25%. Stories about schizophrenia also increase by 33%, but their word count declined by 10%. At the same time, negative stories about mental illness increased by 25% and their word count by 100%. The greatest increase was in negative news about schizophrenia. Stigmatizing stories about schizophrenia increased by 46%, and their length increased from 300 to 1000 words per story per month. CONCLUSION: The immediate effects of the media intervention were positive, resulting in more and longer positive news stories about mental illness and more positive news stories about schizophrenia. However, when considered from a broader perspective, locally focused efforts yielded meager results in light of the larger increases in negative news, particularly in negative news concerning people with schizophrenia--the target group for the program.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a media intervention designed to improve one newspaper's portrayal of mental illnesses, specifically, schizophrenia. The project was part of an international antistigma program, Open the Doors, organized by the World Psychiatric Association. METHODS: The media intervention attempted to influence news content directly by providing reporters with more accurate background information and helping them develop more positive story lines. The evaluation compared story content and length over a 24-month period: 8 months prior to the antistigma intervention and 16 months postintervention. RESULTS: Positive stories outnumbered negative stories by a factor of 2 in both pre- and postperiods. Positive mental health stories increased by 33% in the postintervention period and their word count increased by an average of 25%. Stories about schizophrenia also increase by 33%, but their word count declined by 10%. At the same time, negative stories about mental illness increased by 25% and their word count by 100%. The greatest increase was in negative news about schizophrenia. Stigmatizing stories about schizophrenia increased by 46%, and their length increased from 300 to 1000 words per story per month. CONCLUSION: The immediate effects of the media intervention were positive, resulting in more and longer positive news stories about mental illness and more positive news stories about schizophrenia. However, when considered from a broader perspective, locally focused efforts yielded meager results in light of the larger increases in negative news, particularly in negative news concerning people with schizophrenia--the target group for the program.