Literature DB >> 14673984

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind trial.

David E Yocum1, Daniel E Furst, Jeffrey L Kaine, Andrew R Baldassare, Jon T Stevenson, Mary Ann Borton, Laurel J Mengle-Gaw, Benjamin D Schwartz, Wayne Wisemandle, Qais A Mekki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as monotherapy in controlling the signs and symptoms of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: This was a 6-month, phase III, double-blind, multicenter study. Patients with active RA who had discontinued all disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for an appropriate washout period (at least 1 month) and who, after the washout period, had a stable joint count (at least 10 tender/painful joints and 7 swollen joints) were stratified according to DMARD intolerance or DMARD resistance, and randomized to receive a single daily oral dose of placebo, tacrolimus 2 mg, or tacrolimus 3 mg.
RESULTS: A total of 464 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug. Baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) success (defined as completion of 6 months of treatment and an ACR20 response at the month 6 visit) for the placebo, tacrolimus 2 mg, and tacrolimus 3 mg groups was 10.2%, 18.8% (P < 0.05 versus placebo), and 26.8% (P < 0.0005 versus placebo), respectively. At the end of treatment, the ACR20 and ACR50 response rates in the 3-mg group were 32.0% (P < 0.005 versus placebo) and 11.8% (P < 0.05 versus placebo), respectively. DMARD-intolerant patients had better ACR response rates than did DMARD-resistant patients. Although serum creatinine levels increased by >/=40% from baseline at some time during the trial in 20% and 29% of patients receiving tacrolimus 2 mg/day and 3 mg/day, respectively, the serum creatinine level remained within the normal range throughout the trial in approximately 90% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus, at dosages of both 2 mg/day and 3 mg/day, is efficacious and safe as monotherapy for patients with active RA, but treatment with the 3-mg dose of tacrolimus resulted in generally better ACR response rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673984     DOI: 10.1002/art.11363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  26 in total

1.  Midterm clinico-radiologic findings of an open label observation study of add-on tacrolimus with biologics or non-biologic DMARDs.

Authors:  Yuya Takakubo; Yasunobu Tamaki; Tomoyuki Hirayama; Kiyoshi Iwazaki; Suran Yang; Akiko Sasaki; Haruki Nakano; Yrjö T Konttinen; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Are American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria superior to 20% criteria in distinguishing active aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials reported since 1997? A meta-analysis of discriminant capacities.

Authors:  C P Chung; J L Thompson; G G Koch; I Amara; V Strand; T Pincus
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Shouma Dutta; Yasmeen Ahmad
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Concomitant methotrexate and tacrolimus augment the clinical response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a prior history of biological DMARD use.

Authors:  Nobunori Takahashi; Takayoshi Fujibayashi; Daihei Kida; Yuji Hirano; Takefumi Kato; Daizo Kato; Kiwamu Saito; Atsushi Kaneko; Yuichiro Yabe; Hideki Takagi; Takeshi Oguchi; Hiroyuki Miyake; Tsuyoshi Watanabe; Masatoshi Hayashi; Yasuhide Kanayama; Koji Funahashi; Masahiro Hanabayashi; Shinya Hirabara; Shuji Asai; Toki Takemoto; Kenya Terabe; Nobuyuki Asai; Yutaka Yoshioka; Naoki Ishiguro; Toshihisa Kojima
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  FK506 inhibition of gliostatin/thymidine phosphorylase production induced by tumor necrosis factor-α in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Authors:  Takaya Yamagami; Yuko Waguri-Nagaya; Kenji Ikuta; Mineyoshi Aoyama; Kiyofumi Asai; Takanobu Otsuka
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Tacrolimus and cyclosporine A inhibit human osteoclast formation via targeting the calcineurin-dependent NFAT pathway and an activation pathway for c-Jun or MITF in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Yosuke Fujikawa; Chikahiro Takita; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Risk of serious infection, malignancy, or death in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with a combination of abatacept and tacrolimus: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kenichiro Tokunaga; Kunihiko Matsui; Hideto Oshikawa; Toshihiro Matsui; Shigeto Tohma
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Safety profile of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kimiko Akimoto; Yoshie Kusunoki; Shinichiro Nishio; Kenji Takagi; Shinichi Kawai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Katsuya Suzuki; Hideto Kameda; Koichi Amano; Hayato Nagasawa; Hirofumi Takei; Naoya Sekiguchi; Eiko Nishi; Hiroe Ogawa; Kensei Tsuzaka; Tsutomu Takeuchi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Tacrolimus (FK506): Safety and Applications in Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas H Tung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.