Literature DB >> 14673451

A biomechanical comparison of three lower extremity tendons for ligamentous reconstruction about the knee.

Albert W Pearsall1, J Marcus Hollis, George V Russell, Zachary Scheer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate 3 previously unreported allograft tendons for use in knee surgery. These are the doubled tibialis anterior (TA), doubled tibialis posterior (TP), and doubled peroneus longus (PL) tendons. TYPE OF STUDY: A biomechanical evaluation of the properties of the TA, TP, and PL.
METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs were used for testing. All specimens had the TA, TP, and PL tendons harvested. All specimens were tested in a custom-designed hydraulic testing machine using dry ice clamps. Each tendon was elongated at a rate of 1 mm/s. Load and displacement were recorded with an analog to digital interface board. Stiffness, modulus of elasticity, and stress and strain at failure were calculated.
RESULTS: The average tested lengths of the TA, TP, and PL were 37 cm (range, 13-68 cm), 33 cm (range, 7-74 cm), and 42 cm (range, 17-69 cm), respectively. The average cross-sectional areas of the doubled TA, TP, and PL were 38 mm2, 48 mm2, and 37 mm2, respectively. The average failure loads for the doubled TA, TP, and PL tendons were 3,412 N, 3,391 N, and 2,483 N, respectively. The maximum stresses of the 3 tendons did not differ significantly (85-108 Mpa). The TA had the greatest stiffness (344 N/mm), followed by the TP (302 N/mm) and the PL (244 N/mm). Previous authors have documented the biomechanical strength of grafts for ACL reconstruction between 1,700 and 2,900 Newtons. The ultimate tensile strength and stiffness reported for the TA and TP grafts exceeded that for all previously reported grafts, including the doubled semitendinosus-gracilis.
CONCLUSIONS: The TA, TP, and PL tendons showed excellent biomechanical properties when compared with historical data evaluating other graft sources. The biomechanical properties observed for the TA, TP, and PL were noted in specimens despite an average age of 78.3 years.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673451     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of tenodesis reconstruction in ankle with deltoid ligament deficiency: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Can Xu; Ming-Yan Zhang; Guang-Hua Lei; Can Zhang; Shu-Guang Gao; Wen Ting; Kang-Hua Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Consideration of growth factors and bio-scaffolds for treatment of combined grade II MCL and ACL injury.

Authors:  Natasha Anoka; John Nyland; Mark McGinnis; Dave Lee; Mahmut Nedim Doral; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical and tissue handling property comparison of decellularized and cryopreserved tibialis anterior tendons following extreme incubation and rehydration.

Authors:  J Nyland; N Larsen; R Burden; H Chang; D N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Knee flexor strength after ACL reconstruction: comparison between hamstring autograft, tibialis anterior allograft, and non-injured controls.

Authors:  Sarah Landes; John Nyland; Brian Elmlinger; Ed Tillett; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Drew A Lansdown; Andrew J Riff; Molly Meadows; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does a different dose of gamma irradiation have the same effect on five different types of tendon allografts? - a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gyorgy Hangody; Gábor Szebényi; Bence Abonyi; Rita Kiss; László Hangody; Károly Pap
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Saroj Rai; Sheng-Yang Jin; Bimal Rai; Nira Tamang; Wei Huang; Xian-Zhe Liu; Chun-Qing Meng; Hong Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20

8.  Effects of freezing on the biomechanical and structural properties of human posterior tibial tendons.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Roberto Buda; Francesco Di Caprio; Patrizia Agati; Adriana Bigi; Viviana De Pasquale; Alessandro Ruggeri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Hamstring tendon autograft versus fresh-frozen tibialis posterior allograft in primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study with three to six years follow-up.

Authors:  Mohsen Mardani-Kivi; Mahmoud Karimi-Mobarakeh; Sohrab Keyhani; Khashayar Saheb-Ekhtiari; Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh; Ali Sarvi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Histological study of fresh versus frozen semitendinous muscle tendon allografts.

Authors:  Alexandre Carneiro Bitar; Luiz Augusto Ubirajara Santos; Alberto Tesconi Croci; João Alberto Ramos Maradei Pereira; Edgard N França Bisneto; Arlete Mazzini Miranda Giovani; Claudia Regina G C M Oliveira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.