Literature DB >> 14673195

A strong correlation exists between the distribution of retinal ganglion cells and nose length in the dog.

Paul McGreevy1, Tanya D Grassi, Alison M Harman.   

Abstract

The domestic dog, CANIS LUPUS FAMILIARIS, is a subspecies of the gray wolf, CANIS LUPUS, with almost identical mitochondrial DNA. The dog is the most diverse species on earth, with skull length varying between 7 and 28 cm whereas the wolf skull is around 30 cm long. However, eye size in dogs does not appear to vary as much. For example, small dogs such as the chihuahua appear to have very large eyes in proportion to the skull. Our aim was to examine eye size and retinal cell numbers and distribution to determine whether the dog eye exhibits as much variation as the skull. We found a correlation between eye radius and skull dimensions. However, the most surprising finding was that the distribution of ganglion cells in the eye varied tremendously from a horizontally aligned visual streak of fairly even density across the retina (as seen in the wolf) to a strong area centralis with virtually no streak (for example, as observed in a pug from the current series). This variation in ganglion cell density within a single species is quite unique. Intriguingly, the ratio of peak ganglion cell density in the area centralis to visual streak was highly negatively correlated with skull length (r = -0.795, n = 22) and positively correlated with cephalic index (r = 0.687, n = 22). The orientation of eyelid aperture was also correlated with cephalic index (r = 0.648, n = 22). Therefore, the genetic manipulation of selective breeding, which has produced an abnormal shortening of the skull and eyelids with less lateral apertures, has also produced a considerably more pronounced area centralis in the dog. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14673195     DOI: 10.1159/000073756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  37 in total

Review 1.  What do dogs (Canis familiaris) see? A review of vision in dogs and implications for cognition research.

Authors:  Sarah-Elizabeth Byosiere; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Illusory contour perception in domestic dogs.

Authors:  Sarah-Elizabeth Byosiere; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

4.  Functional and structural changes in a canine model of hereditary primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Sinisa D Grozdanic; Helga Kecova; Matthew M Harper; Wijitha Nilaweera; Markus H Kuehn; Randy H Kardon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 6.  The use of canine models of inherited retinal degeneration to test novel therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  William A Beltran
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.644

7.  The genetics of canine skull shape variation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Schoenebeck; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Phenotypic variation and genotype-phenotype discordance in canine cone-rod dystrophy with an RPGRIP1 mutation.

Authors:  Keiko Miyadera; Kumiko Kato; Jesús Aguirre-Hernández; Tsuyoshi Tokuriki; Kyohei Morimoto; Claudia Busse; Keith Barnett; Nigel Holmes; Hiroyuki Ogawa; Nobuo Sasaki; Cathryn S Mellersh; David R Sargan
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs.

Authors:  Márta Gácsi; Paul McGreevy; Edina Kara; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Topographical characterization of cone photoreceptors and the area centralis of the canine retina.

Authors:  Freya M Mowat; Simon M Petersen-Jones; Helen Williamson; David L Williams; Philip J Luthert; Robin R Ali; James W Bainbridge
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.