Literature DB >> 14673049

Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial.

Katja Ott1, Ulrich Fink, Karen Becker, Alexander Stahl, Hans-Joachim Dittler, Raymonde Busch, Hubert Stein, Florian Lordick, Thomas Link, Markus Schwaiger, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert, Wolfgang A Weber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the predictive value of therapy-induced reduction of tumor glucose use for subsequent response and patient survival in patients with gastric cancer treated by preoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced gastric carcinomas were studied by positron emission tomography with the glucose analog fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) at baseline and 14 days after initiation of cisplatin-based polychemotherapy. On the basis of a previous study, a reduction of tumor FDG uptake by more than 35% was used as a criterion for a metabolic response. The metabolic response in FDG-PET was correlated with histopathologic response after completion of therapy (< 10% viable tumor cells in the resected specimen) and patient survival.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (80%) of the 44 tumors were visualized with sufficient contrast for quantitative analysis (two of 19 intestinal and seven of 25 nonintestinal tumors showed only low FDG uptake). In the 35 assessable patients, PET imaging after 14 days of therapy correctly predicted histopathologic response after 3 months of therapy in 10 (77%) of 13 responders and 19 (86%) of 22 nonresponders. Median overall survival for patients with a metabolic response has not been reached (2-year survival rate, 90%); for patients without a metabolic response, median survival was only 18.9 months (2-year survival rate, 25%; P =.002)
CONCLUSION: This study prospectively demonstrates that in patients with gastric cancer, response to preoperative chemotherapy can be predicted by FDG-PET early during the course of therapy. By avoiding the morbidity and costs of ineffective therapy, FDG-PET imaging may markedly facilitate the use of preoperative chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673049     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  98 in total

1.  Early evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using FDG-PET/CT predicts survival prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuchi; Yuji Nakamoto; Shogo Shinohara; Keizo Fujiwara; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Yuji Kanazawa; Risa Kurihara; Ippei Kishimoto; Hiroyuki Harada; Yasushi Naito
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Predictive value of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in head and neck cancer: importance of standardization: editorial on EAORL-D-10-00277.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  [Gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: principles of neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  F Lordick; K Ott; A Sendler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Response prediction--early response evaluation. Consequences for surgical oncology].

Authors:  J R Siewert; F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Anish Thomas; Esther Mena; Karen Kurdziel; David Venzon; Sean Khozin; Arlene W Berman; Peter Choyke; Eva Szabo; Arun Rajan; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Surgical management of esophagogastric junction tumors.

Authors:  Burkhard H A von Rahden; Hubert J Stein; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology.

Authors:  Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET.

Authors:  A Stahl; K Ott; M Schwaiger; W A Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.