Literature DB >> 14672744

Non-invasive assessment of myocardial recovery on chronic left ventricular assist device: results associated with successful device removal.

John Gorcsan1, Donald Severyn, Srinivas Murali, Robert L Kormos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial recovery may occur in patients with heart failure who are receiving left ventricular assist-device support, but identification of candidates for device removal remains challenging. We hypothesized that on-line quantitative echocardiography during trials of decreased device support alone or in combination with exercise cardiopulmonary testing can assess cardiac recovery to predict successful device removal.
METHODS: We studied 18 patients with severe heart failure, aged 45 +/- 19 years, who received 234 +/- 169 days of assist-device support as a bridge to transplantation. We used echocardiographic automated border detection from mid-ventricular short-axis images and non-invasive arterial pressure to measure beat-to-beat responses in 2 to 5 minute trials of decreased device flow. We also assessed maximal oxygen consumption in 14 patients who could exercise.
RESULTS: Six patients experienced myocardial recovery and underwent successful device removal; 12 remained device dependent. With transient, low assist-device flow, patients with device removal had increased echocardiographic stroke area of 27% +/- 36% vs -24% +/- 12% (p < 0.05) and fractional area change of 51% +/- 13% vs 23% +/- 11% (p < 0.05) in the patients who were device dependent. Estimates of pre-load-adjusted maximal power, a relatively load-independent index, were 6.7 +/- 2.1 mW/cm(4) in patients with successful device removal vs 1.2 +/- 1.2 mW/cm(4) in patients who were device dependent (p < 0.005). Maximal oxygen consumption was 17.2 +/- 1.4 ml/kg/min in patients with myocardial recovery vs 13.1 +/- 1.9 ml/kg/min in patients who were device dependent (p < 0.005) and correlated with pre-load-adjusted maximal power (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). Maximal oxygen consumption >16 ml/kg/min, increased stroke area, >40% increase in fractional area change, or pre-load-adjusted maximal power >4.0 mW/cm(4) with low device flow were associated with successful device removal (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: On-line quantitative echocardiography alone or combined with exercise cardiopulmonary testing can assess myocardial recovery of patients receiving left ventricular assist-device support and has the potential to identify patients who are clinical candidates for device removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14672744     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(03)00056-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  17 in total

Review 1.  Is myocardial recovery possible and how do you measure it?

Authors:  Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Ventricular assist devices: destination therapy or just another stop on the road?

Authors:  Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2004 Apr-May

5.  Titanium Plug Closure after HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device Explantation in a 15-Year-Old Girl: First U.S. Experience.

Authors:  Diego A Lara; Aamir Jeewa; Barbara A Elias; Elizabeth O McCullum; Susan W Denfield; William J Dreyer; Iki Adachi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Development of a hybrid decision support model for optimal ventricular assist device weaning.

Authors:  Linda C Santelices; Yajuan Wang; Don Severyn; Marek J Druzdzel; Robert L Kormos; James F Antaki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Advancing the Science of Myocardial Recovery with Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Working Group of the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Francis D Pagani; Martha S Lundberg; J Timothy Baldwin
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Left ventricular assist device unloading effects on myocardial structure and function: current status of the field and call for action.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Craig H Selzman; Divya Ratan Verma; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 10.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.