Literature DB >> 14672638

Mammography-facility-based patient reminders and repeat mammograms for Medicare in New York State.

John Quinley1, Terry Mahotière, Catherine R Messina, Ti-Kuang Lee, Claudia Mikail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women who receive mammograms may fail to regularly return for repeat mammography. Many mammography facilities send annual patient reminders, but there are no large studies of their impact on overall mammography return rates, or by patient population subgroups.
METHODS: Medicare claims data were used to identify New York women with claims for mammograms during a baseline and an 18-month follow-up period (1999-2000). Receipt of a second mammogram was examined in relation to whether the facility sends annual reminders, while controlling for other patient factors.
RESULTS: Of 97,506 women studied, 76% attended facilities that send annual reminders. Of these women, 74% received a second mammogram within 18 months compared to 67% for other women. The impact of reminders was significant in all subgroups, but was less for women who were younger, minority, in Medicaid, in New York City or who received a diagnostic mammogram. In multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for return within 18 months if the facility uses reminders was 1.42 (95% CI 1.37-1.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Annual patient reminders from mammography facilities are effective in increasing regular repeat mammography in Medicare women, although their impact is smaller in some groups. Facilities that do not currently send reminders should be encouraged to do so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14672638     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  12 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Stephanie Foster; Barry Flanagan; Andrew Dent
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

3.  Assessment of characteristics of capacity among breast cancer screening facilities.

Authors:  Vicki L Collie-Akers; Cynthia Warrick; Li Zhu; Misha Granado; Kymeiria Ingram
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

4.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

5.  Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Prevalence and correlates of recent and repeat mammography among California women ages 55-79.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Roberta Wyn; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Jessica King
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; J Michael Bowling; David Farrell; Celette S Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.