BACKGROUND: The Checklist of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) was developed to screen children for movement difficulties in the school situation. However, the psychometric properties of the Checklist have not been investigated in detail. AIM: The psychometric properties of the M-ABC Checklist were investigated including its usefulness as a screening instrument. SAMPLES: A group of 120 children, 6 to 11 years old, randomly selected from mainstream schools and a group of 64 children, 6 to 9 years old, referred for assessment of their motor functioning. METHODS: A reliability analysis was performed to investigate whether the 48 items of the Checklist measure the same construct. Construct validity was investigated by means of a factor analysis. And lastly, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Checklist were investigated by comparing the performance of children on both the Test and Checklist of the M-ABC. RESULTS: The items of the Checklist measure the same construct. Seven factors were obtained after factor analysis, revealing that the Checklist measures a broad range of motor skills. The Checklist met the standards for sensitivity in all age groups, except in the 8-year-old group, where too many children with motor problems were not detected. With the exception of the 6-year-old children, specificity was poor. The positive predictive value was acceptable, except for the 7-year-old children. CONCLUSION: The Checklist proved to meet standards for reliability and most aspects of validity. Its use by teachers for screening children with movement difficulties can be recommended.
BACKGROUND: The Checklist of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) was developed to screen children for movement difficulties in the school situation. However, the psychometric properties of the Checklist have not been investigated in detail. AIM: The psychometric properties of the M-ABC Checklist were investigated including its usefulness as a screening instrument. SAMPLES: A group of 120 children, 6 to 11 years old, randomly selected from mainstream schools and a group of 64 children, 6 to 9 years old, referred for assessment of their motor functioning. METHODS: A reliability analysis was performed to investigate whether the 48 items of the Checklist measure the same construct. Construct validity was investigated by means of a factor analysis. And lastly, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Checklist were investigated by comparing the performance of children on both the Test and Checklist of the M-ABC. RESULTS: The items of the Checklist measure the same construct. Seven factors were obtained after factor analysis, revealing that the Checklist measures a broad range of motor skills. The Checklist met the standards for sensitivity in all age groups, except in the 8-year-old group, where too many children with motor problems were not detected. With the exception of the 6-year-old children, specificity was poor. The positive predictive value was acceptable, except for the 7-year-old children. CONCLUSION: The Checklist proved to meet standards for reliability and most aspects of validity. Its use by teachers for screening children with movement difficulties can be recommended.
Authors: Ellen A Fliers; Marieke L A de Hoog; Barbara Franke; Stephen V Faraone; Nanda N J Rommelse; Jan K Buitelaar; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Ellen A Fliers; Jan K Buitelaar; Athanasios Maras; Kim Bul; Esther Höhle; Stephen V Faraone; Barbara Franke; Nanda N J Rommelse Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Jolanda C Naafs; Jan Pieter Marchal; Eric Fliers; Paul H Verkerk; Michiel A J Luijten; Anita Boelen; A S Paul van Trotsenburg; Nitash Zwaveling-Soonawala Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nienke H van Dokkum; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Judith Th B W de Best; Marleen Hamoen; Sanne C M Te Wierike; Arend F Bos; Marlou L A de Kroon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 3.390