Literature DB >> 14671719

Plasticity in body composition in breeding birds: what drives the metabolic costs of egg production?

François Vézina1, Tony D Williams.   

Abstract

Body composition in vertebrates is known to show phenotypic plasticity, and changes in organ masses are usually rapid and reversible. One of the most rapid and reversible changes is the transformation of the female avian reproductive organs before breeding. This provides an excellent system to investigate the effects of plasticity in organ size on basal metabolic rate (BMR) through relationships between organ masses and BMR. We compared body composition of female European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) during various reproductive stages over 3 yr and investigated the pattern of changes in reproductive and nonreproductive organ mass during follicular development and ovulation. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between organ mass and resting metabolic rate (RMR) in nonbreeding, laying, and chick-rearing females. Our analysis revealed marked variation in organ masses between breeding stages but no consistent pattern among years except for kidney and pectoralis muscle. Furthermore, changes in nonreproductive organs did not parallel the cycle of growth and regression of the reproductive organs. The oviduct gained 62% of its 22-fold increase in mass in only 3 d, and oviduct regression was just as rapid and began even before the final egg of the clutch was laid, with 42% of the oviduct mass lost before laying of the final egg. In laying females, 18% of variation in mass-corrected RMR was explained by the mass of the oviduct (r2=0.18, n=80, P<0.0005), while pectoralis muscle mass in nonbreeding individuals and liver and gizzard mass in chick-rearing females were the only organs significantly related to RMR (r2=0.31-0.44). We suggest that the nonreproductive organs are affected more by changes in local ecological conditions than the reproductive state itself and that the activity and maintenance cost of the oviduct is high enough that selection has led to a very tight size-function relationship for this organ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14671719     DOI: 10.1086/376425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  11 in total

1.  Effect of food restriction on the energy metabolism of the Chinese bulbul (Pycnonotus sinensis).

Authors:  Qing-Jian Liang; Lei Zhao; Jia-Qi Wang; Qian Chen; Wei-Hong Zheng; Jin-Song Liu
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 2.  How low can you go? An adaptive energetic framework for interpreting basal metabolic rate variation in endotherms.

Authors:  David L Swanson; Andrew E McKechnie; François Vézina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Experimentally reducing corticosterone mitigates rapid captivity effects on behavior, but not body composition, in a wild bird.

Authors:  Christine R Lattin; Anita V Pechenenko; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Breeding stage and tissue isotopic consistency suggests colony-level flexibility in niche breadth of an Arctic marine bird.

Authors:  Kyle J L Parkinson; Holly L Hennin; H Grant Gilchrist; Keith A Hobson; Nigel E Hussey; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Variation in female reproductive tract morphology across the reproductive cycle in the zebra finch.

Authors:  Laura L Hurley; Ondi L Crino; Melissah Rowe; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Metabolic adjustments in breeding female kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) include changes in kidney metabolic intensity.

Authors:  Bernt Rønning; Børge Moe; Olivier Chastel; Juli Broggi; Magdalene Langset; Claus Bech
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Physiological predictors of reproductive performance in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Alan A Cohen; Tony D Williams; Melinda A Fowler; Mélissa Paquet; Véronique Legault
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) shift toward aerodynamically efficient flight kinematics in response to an artificial load.

Authors:  Anthony B Lapsansky; Jennifer A Igoe; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Mechanistic drivers of flexibility in summit metabolic rates of small birds.

Authors:  David Swanson; Yufeng Zhang; Marisa King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Large muscles are beneficial but not required for improving thermogenic capacity in small birds.

Authors:  Myriam S Milbergue; Pierre U Blier; François Vézina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.