BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a more specific and sensitive biomarker than creatine kinase MB (CKMB) for detection of myocardial damage. We report the prevalence of positive cTnI and CKMB mass among patients hospitalized with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the potential impact of use of different reference cutoffs, particularly those proposed by European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) consensus guidelines, on rates of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We analyzed 1719 consecutive patients with suspected ACS admitted to an urban acute care hospital over a 6-month period. Patients (> or = 18 years of age) had at least two separate sets of plasma biomarkers (cTnI and CKMB) measured more than 12-24 h after admission to determine the potential rates of AMI based on different biomarker cutoff concentrations. RESULTS: The prevalence of cTnI-positive cases ranged from 10.6%, based on a cutoff of twice the ROC curve (cTnI < or =1.2 microg/L), to 25.0%, using the ESC/ACC-recommended 99th percentile cutoff (cTnI <0.1 microg/L). The prevalence of CKMB-positive cases ranged from 10.4%, with the cutoff of twice the ROC curve (CKMB < or =10.0 microg/L) to 21.7%, with the 99th percentile cutoff (CKMB <3.9 microg/L). Use of the 10% CV cutoff (cTnI < or =0.3 microg/L and CKMB <3.9 microg/L) instead of the ROC cutoff produced a 26% increase in all cTnI-positive cases. Use of the 99th percentile reference cutoff instead of the ROC curve-derived cutoff produced an 85% increase in all cTnI-positive cases. A substantial proportion of the increase in total cTnI-positive cases was derived from cTnI-positive/CKMB-negative cases: 71 (4.1%), 73 (4.2%), 98 (5.7%), and 209 (12.2%) of cTnI-positive cases were CKMB-negative, as determined by the twice the ROC, ROC, 10% CV, and 99th percentile reference cutoffs, respectively. At the 99th percentile cutoffs, 8.8% of cases were CKMB-positive/cTnI-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Use of lower reference cutoffs for plasma biomarkers, as recommended by ESC/ACC guidelines, markedly increases the rates of cTnI-positive cases overall. A substantial proportion of the increase in total cTnI-positive cases was derived from the creation of additional cTnI-positive/CKMB-negative cases. CKMB-positive/cTnI-negative cases are likely false positive for myocardial injury.
BACKGROUND:Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a more specific and sensitive biomarker than creatine kinase MB (CKMB) for detection of myocardial damage. We report the prevalence of positive cTnI and CKMB mass among patients hospitalized with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the potential impact of use of different reference cutoffs, particularly those proposed by European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) consensus guidelines, on rates of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We analyzed 1719 consecutive patients with suspected ACS admitted to an urban acute care hospital over a 6-month period. Patients (> or = 18 years of age) had at least two separate sets of plasma biomarkers (cTnI and CKMB) measured more than 12-24 h after admission to determine the potential rates of AMI based on different biomarker cutoff concentrations. RESULTS: The prevalence of cTnI-positive cases ranged from 10.6%, based on a cutoff of twice the ROC curve (cTnI < or =1.2 microg/L), to 25.0%, using the ESC/ACC-recommended 99th percentile cutoff (cTnI <0.1 microg/L). The prevalence of CKMB-positive cases ranged from 10.4%, with the cutoff of twice the ROC curve (CKMB < or =10.0 microg/L) to 21.7%, with the 99th percentile cutoff (CKMB <3.9 microg/L). Use of the 10% CV cutoff (cTnI < or =0.3 microg/L and CKMB <3.9 microg/L) instead of the ROC cutoff produced a 26% increase in all cTnI-positive cases. Use of the 99th percentile reference cutoff instead of the ROC curve-derived cutoff produced an 85% increase in all cTnI-positive cases. A substantial proportion of the increase in total cTnI-positive cases was derived from cTnI-positive/CKMB-negative cases: 71 (4.1%), 73 (4.2%), 98 (5.7%), and 209 (12.2%) of cTnI-positive cases were CKMB-negative, as determined by the twice the ROC, ROC, 10% CV, and 99th percentile reference cutoffs, respectively. At the 99th percentile cutoffs, 8.8% of cases were CKMB-positive/cTnI-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Use of lower reference cutoffs for plasma biomarkers, as recommended by ESC/ACC guidelines, markedly increases the rates of cTnI-positive cases overall. A substantial proportion of the increase in total cTnI-positive cases was derived from the creation of additional cTnI-positive/CKMB-negative cases. CKMB-positive/cTnI-negative cases are likely false positive for myocardial injury.
Authors: Prema Gurumurthy; Sai Krishna Borra; Rama Krishna Reddy Yeruva; Dolice Victor; Sai Babu; K M Cherian Journal: Indian J Clin Biochem Date: 2013-08-10
Authors: José Carlos Nicolau; Gilson Soares Feitosa Filho; João Luiz Petriz; Remo Holanda de Mendonça Furtado; Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Walmor Lemke; Renato Delascio Lopes; Ari Timerman; José A Marin Neto; Luiz Bezerra Neto; Bruno Ferraz de Oliveira Gomes; Eduardo Cavalcanti Lapa Santos; Leopoldo Soares Piegas; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Alexandre Jorge de Andrade Negri; Andre Franci; Brivaldo Markman Filho; Bruno Mendonça Baccaro; Carlos Eduardo Lucena Montenegro; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos José Dornas Gonçalves Barbosa; Cláudio Marcelo Bittencourt das Virgens; Edson Stefanini; Euler Roberto Fernandes Manenti; Felipe Gallego Lima; Francisco das Chagas Monteiro Júnior; Harry Correa Filho; Henrique Patrus Mundim Pena; Ibraim Masciarelli Francisco Pinto; João Luiz de Alencar Araripe Falcão; Joberto Pinheiro Sena; José Maria Peixoto; Juliana Ascenção de Souza; Leonardo Sara da Silva; Lilia Nigro Maia; Louis Nakayama Ohe; Luciano Moreira Baracioli; Luís Alberto de Oliveira Dallan; Luis Augusto Palma Dallan; Luiz Alberto Piva E Mattos; Luiz Carlos Bodanese; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Manoel Fernandes Canesin; Marcelo Bueno da Silva Rivas; Marcelo Franken; Marcos José Gomes Magalhães; Múcio Tavares de Oliveira Júnior; Nivaldo Menezes Filgueiras Filho; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Paulo Ernesto Leães; Paulo Roberto Ferreira Rossi; Paulo Rogério Soares; Pedro Alves Lemos Neto; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rafael Rebêlo C Cavalcanti; Renato Jorge Alves; Renato Abdala Karam Kalil; Roberto Esporcatte; Roberto Luiz Marino; Roberto Rocha Corrêa Veiga Giraldez; Romeu Sérgio Meneghelo; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Rui Fernando Ramos; Sandra Nivea Dos Reis Saraiva Falcão; Talia Falcão Dalçóquio; Viviana de Mello Guzzo Lemke; William Azem Chalela; Wilson Mathias Júnior Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.667
Authors: Andrew E Moran; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Abraham Flaxman; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 29.690