Literature DB >> 14670700

Contour grouping inside and outside of facial contexts.

James R Pomerantz1, Alpna Agrawal, Stephen W Jewell, Martha Jeong, Hana Khan, Sandra C Lozano.   

Abstract

We examine how contours group in isolation compared with when they are embedded in face-like contexts. As previously shown, contours that seem to group by phenomenological observation also show powerful effects on task performance: with contours that group, selective attention to one while ignoring another is poor (as indexed by Garner Interference (GI), but not Stroop Interference), whereas divided attention across contours is good. With contours that do not group, however, the reverse happens. Here we test pairs of curved lines (parentheses) displayed either in isolation or within contexts including cartoon faces, where these curves may serve as mouths or eyebrows. The results with isolated contours replicate previous findings of poor selective attention, but within face-like contexts the same contours showed nearly perfect selective attention (i.e., zero GI). Thus, contour grouping was weaker inside than outside of faces, a finding that contrasts with the widely-held belief that faces are processed configurally, not by local features.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14670700     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  2 in total

1.  Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; James R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A Neural Network Model With Gap Junction for Topological Detection.

Authors:  Chaoming Wang; Risheng Lian; Xingsi Dong; Yuanyuan Mi; Si Wu
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.380

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.