Literature DB >> 14670643

Differential effects of progestins on hemostasis.

Adolf E Schindler1.   

Abstract

Recently large, prospective, randomized studies on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have indicated that the progestin use might interfere with hemostasis and thus increase venous thrombotic events. Therefore, available publications were evaluated to determine whether progestins interfere with hemostasis, either when given alone via oral or parenteral routes or in combination with ethinylestradiol as synthetic estrogen or natural estrogens. There are indications that such interference is dependent upon the type and dose of the progestin, the route of application, the length of treatment and the type and dose of the estrogen with which it is combined. For natural progesterone, no negative effects on the hemostatic system were seen with either oral or parenteral application, in cyclic or continuous regimens, for the doses investigated. Similarly, no unwanted effects were seen with progestin only pills (POP), independent of the type and dose of progestin, or parenteral progestins. With the high-dose progestins used in gynaecological oncology, the increased activation of the hemostatic system resulting from the disease itself has to be taken into account when looking at any increased incidence of thromboembolic events in these patients. For estrogen/progestin combinations, the risk of venous thromboembolism is attributed to the estrogen used. Recent studies showed an increased rate of thromboembolic events in association with desogestrel-and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives, compared with those containing levonorgestrel. With HRT, a decrease in antithrombin factors could explain the increased rate of venous thrombotic events. In conclusion, progestins seems to have different effects on the hemostatic system due to their different pattern of biological activities. This was also shown in the arterial vascular system, where some progestins may reduce the endothelium-dependent vasodilating action of estrogens and stimulate intima proliferation and upregulate thrombin receptor expression while other progestins did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14670643     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  Synthetic progestins induce growth and metastasis of BT-474 human breast cancer xenografts in nude mice.

Authors:  Yayun Liang; Indira Benakanakere; Cynthia Besch-Williford; Ryyan S Hyder; Mark R Ellersieck; Salman M Hyder
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Natural Micronized Progesterone Sustained Release (SR) and Luteal Phase: Role Redefined!!

Authors:  Sonia Malik; Korukonda Krishnaprasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  State of the Art Review: Emerging Therapies: The Use of Insulin Sensitizers in the Treatment of Adolescents with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).

Authors:  David H Geller; Danièle Pacaud; Catherine M Gordon; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-26

Review 4.  Role of androgens, progestins and tibolone in the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a review of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Maria Garefalakis; Martha Hickey
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of the new estrogen-free contraceptive pill containing 4 mg drospirenone alone in a 24/4 regime.

Authors:  Santiago Palacios; Enrico Colli; Pedro-Antonio Regidor
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.