Literature DB >> 14670573

Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.

Beverly C Butler1, Gail A Eskes, Robert A Vandorpe.   

Abstract

Previous studies of target-cancellation performance in visuospatial neglect patients have reported lateral (left-right) and radial (near-far) gradients of attentional ability. The purpose of the present study was to replicate the reported attentional gradients in peripersonal space (within arms reach) and to examine whether lateral gradients of detection also appear in extrapersonal space (beyond arms reach), using equivalent tasks with no manual requirement. The relationship between radial gradients in peripersonal space and neglect severity (degree of lateral gradient) in extrapersonal space was also of interest. Right-hemisphere stroke subjects, with and without neglect, and healthy control subjects named visual targets on scanning sheets placed in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. The neglect group showed lateral gradients of increasing target detection from left to right in both peripersonal and extrapersonal space, which were not evident in the performance of either of the control groups. Double dissociations of neglect severity in peripersonal and extrapersonal space were also found in analyses of individual performance. Lesion analyses showed that peripersonal neglect was related to dorsal stream damage and extrapersonal neglect was related to ventral stream damage. Group analyses showed no significant radial gradients in peripersonal space in the three groups. In addition, while analyses of some individuals found significant near-far and far-near radial gradients, there was no correlation between radial gradients in peripersonal space and neglect severity in extrapersonal space. These results are discussed in terms of theorised hemispheric mechanisms of spatial attention and the relationship of neglect in the two co-ordinate spaces to the extent and location of damaged neurons in the right hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14670573     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Asymmetrical after-effects of prism adaptation during goal oriented locomotion.

Authors:  Carine Michel; Paul Vernet; Grégoire Courtine; Yves Ballay; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of limb movements on orienting of attention in right-hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Beverly C Butler; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster; José Van Velzen; Gita Prabhu
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.

Authors:  Alison R Lane; Keira Ball; Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Daniel Sanabria; Gemma A Calvert; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Spatio-temporal features of visual exploration in unilaterally brain-damaged subjects with or without neglect: results from a touchscreen test.

Authors:  Marco Rabuffetti; Elisabetta Farina; Margherita Alberoni; Daniele Pellegatta; Ildebrando Appollonio; Paola Affanni; Marco Forni; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perceptual and locomotor factors affect obstacle avoidance in persons with visuospatial neglect.

Authors:  Gayatri Aravind; Anouk Lamontagne
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  "Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.

Authors:  Natalie de Bruin; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Functional assessment of region-specific neglect: are there differential behavioural consequences of peripersonal versus extrapersonal neglect?

Authors:  T C W Nijboer; A F Ten Brink; M Kouwenhoven; J M A Visser-Meily
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.