Literature DB >> 14669521

Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat.

G Campbell Teskey1, Corey Flynn, Crystal D Goertzen, Marie H Monfils, Nicole A Young.   

Abstract

Improving functional recovery following cerebral strokes in humans will likely involve augmenting brain plasticity. This study examined skilled forelimb behavior, neocortical evoked potentials, and movement thresholds to assess cortical electrical stimulation concurrent with rehabilitative forelimb usage following a focal ischemic insult. Adult rats were trained on a task that required skilled usage of both forelimbs. They then underwent an acute focal ischemic insult to the caudal forelimb area of sensorimotor cortex contralateral to their preferred forelimb. During the same procedure, they also received a stimulation electrode over the infarct area and two depth electrodes anterior to the lesion to record evoked potentials. One week following the surgery, rats received cortical stimulation during performance of the skilled task. Evoked potentials and movement thresholds were also determined. Functional assessment revealed that cortical stimulation resulted in superior performance compared to the no stimulation group, and this was initially due to a shift in forelimb preference. Cortical stimulation also resulted in enhanced evoked potentials and a reduction in the amount of current required to elicit a movement, in a stimulation frequency dependent manner. This study suggests that cortical stimulation, concurrent with rehabilitative training, results in better forelimb usage that may be due to augmented synaptic plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14669521     DOI: 10.1179/016164103771953871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  48 in total

1.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rafael Polanía; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  In vitro and in vivo neuronal electrotaxis: a potential mechanism for restoration?

Authors:  Ali Jahanshahi; Lisa-Maria Schönfeld; Evi Lemmens; Sven Hendrix; Yasin Temel
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Experience--a double edged sword for restorative neural plasticity after brain damage.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2008-03-01

4.  Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions.

Authors:  DeAnna L Adkins; J Edward Hsu; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke.

Authors:  Sarvenaz Nouri; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Experience-dependent neural plasticity in the adult damaged brain.

Authors:  Abigail L Kerr; Shao-Ying Cheng; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Adaptive changes in the motor cortex during and after longterm forelimb immobilization in adult rats.

Authors:  Riccardo Viaro; Mirco Budri; Pierantonio Parmiani; Gianfranco Franchi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  High γ power in ECoG reflects cortical electrical stimulation effects on unit activity in layers V/VI.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Leonardo Cohen; Bruce Dobkin; Gary Ford; Richard Greenwood; David Howard; Masud Husain; Malcolm Macleod; Randolph Nudo; John Rothwell; Anthony Rudd; James Teo; Nicholas Ward; Steven Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Factors influencing cerebral plasticity in the normal and injured brain.

Authors:  Bryan Kolb; G Campbell Teskey; Robbin Gibb
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.