Literature DB >> 14669292

Should molecular testing be required for diagnosing synovial sarcoma? A prospective study of 204 cases.

Jean-Michel Coindre1, Manuela Pelmus, Isabelle Hostein, Catherine Lussan, Binh N Bui, Louis Guillou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The t(X;18) translocation is a specific marker of synovial sarcomas (SS). Detection of SYT-SSX transcripts by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was tested on preselected specimens of well-established histologic types, but to our knowledge, the diagnostic utility of molecular assays on a series of potential SS in comparison with conventional tools has never been reported.
METHODS: Two hundred four consecutive cases of potential SS submitted for a second opinion were studied prospectively. On the basis of clinical context, histologic aspect, and immunohistochemical profile, the tumors were divided into three categories: 1) diagnosis of SS certain, when the only possible diagnosis was SS; 2) diagnosis of SS probable, when SS was the first diagnosis contemplated, but a differential diagnostic issue was raised by other tumors; 3) diagnosis of SS possible, when the diagnosis of SS was not the first diagnosis considered. Detection of SYT-SSX transcripts was performed using real-time PCR from fixed, embedded tissue as a systematic test.
RESULTS: Sufficient RNA samples were recovered for PCR from 177 specimens (87%). One hundred four specimens (51%) were positive for SYT-SSX transcripts. Tumor sites of SS included the extremities (n = 57), lung (n = 13), trunk wall (n = 12), head and neck (n = 6), and other sites (n = 16). There were 61 monophasic, 22 poorly differentiated, 17 biphasic, and 4 predominantly epithelial SS. For 58 tumor specimens (29%), diagnosis of SS was certain before molecular testing; 49 (84.5%) of these 58 contained SYT-SSX transcripts. For 39 tumor specimens (19%), diagnosis of SS was probable; 29 (74.4%) of these 39 contained SYT-SSX transcripts. For 107 tumor specimens (52%), diagnosis of SS was only possible and strongly challenged by another histologic type. The issue consisted mainly of making the distinction between an SS and a poorly differentiated spindle cell sarcoma (n = 49), a poorly differentiated round cell sarcoma (n = 34), a carcinoma (n = 11), a myoepithelioma (n = 8), or an epithelioid fibrosarcoma (n = 5).Twenty-six tumor specimens (24.3%) contained SYT-SSX transcripts-10, 7, 5, 3, and 1 in the spindle cell tumor, round cell tumor, carcinomalike tumor, myoepitheliomalike tumor, and epithelioid-fibrosarcoma-like tumor categories, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular testing was not required if the diagnosis of SS was certain or probable on the basis of clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical evaluation. However, it proved to be very helpful or necessary when the diagnosis of SS was only possible and was challenged by other tumor types, mainly other spindle cell sarcomas, round cell sarcomas, carcinomas, myoepitheliomas, and epithelioid fibrosarcomas. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14669292     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  27 in total

1.  Synovial sarcoma with radiological appearances of primitive neuroectodermal tumour/Ewing sarcoma: differentiation by molecular genetic studies.

Authors:  P O'Donnell; T C Diss; J Whelan; A M Flanagan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Synovial sarcoma of primary bone origin: a rare case in a rare site with atypical features.

Authors:  Seung Chai Jung; Jung-Ah Choi; Jin-Haeng Chung; Joo Han Oh; Joon Woo Lee; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Malignant inguinal monophasic synovial sarcoma: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ji Xu; Jia Wang; Long Cui; Xiangru Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  An unusual breast mass: primary synovial sarcoma.

Authors:  Victoria J Doyle; Adrian C Bateman; Jeffery M Theaker
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-19

5.  Rare case: Monophasic pleuropulmonary synovial sarcoma.

Authors:  Rateesh Sareen; Chandra Lekha Pandey
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-07

6.  Factors Associated With Survival in Patients With Synovial Cell Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: An Analysis of 167 Cases Using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Database.

Authors:  Jon Mallen-St Clair; Armin Arshi; Elliot Abemayor; Maie St John
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 7.  Primary monophasic synovial sarcoma of the tonsil: immunohistochemical and molecular study of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Danny Soria-Céspedes; Aldo Iván Galván-Linares; Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle; Francisco Gaitan-Gaona; Carlos Ortiz-Hidalgo
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2013-04-07

Review 8.  Primary pulmonary biphasic synovial sarcoma confirmed by molecular detection of a SYT-SSX2 fusion gene: report of 1 case.

Authors:  Jae Seok Park; Bo Ram Min; Soon Hyo Park; Kun Young Kwon; Dong-Yoon Keum; Won-Il Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Exomic analysis of myxoid liposarcomas, synovial sarcomas, and osteosarcomas.

Authors:  Christine G Joseph; Heejung Hwang; Yuchen Jiao; Laura D Wood; Isaac Kinde; Jian Wu; Nils Mandahl; Jinyong Luo; Ralph H Hruban; Luis A Diaz; Tong-Chuan He; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Fredrik Mertens; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 10.  Molecular pathology of sarcomas: concepts and clinical implications.

Authors:  Judith V M G Bovée; Pancras C W Hogendoorn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.