Literature DB >> 14668770

Coronary calcium screening in asymptomatic patients as a guide to risk factor modification and stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Kevin W Moser1, James H O'Keefe, Timothy M Bateman, Iain A McGhie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between the extent of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and atherosclerotic plaque. As a result, CAC screening could be useful in predicting cardiovascular risk in individuals in whom atherosclerosis is developing. One possible method of detecting and quantifying CAC is by x-ray computed tomography, which potentially allows one to stratify patients into groups requiring risk factor modification or follow-up testing such as myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical utility of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in a cardiology practice setting. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from 794 asymptomatic patients who underwent CAC screening over an 8-month period. On the basis of the CAC score and physician consultation, 102 patients underwent subsequent myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. A substudy was also conducted in 306 patients to measure the interscan variability of MDCT across different CAC score ranges. CAC was detected in 422 of 794 patients. Of these, the CAC was moderate (Agatston score = 101-400) in 14% and severe (>400) in 9%. Patients with 3 or more cardiac risk factors were most likely to exhibit moderate to severe CAC. In myocardial perfusion SPECT testing, no patient with an Agatston score lower than 100 had an abnormal study. In contrast, 41% of patients with severe CAC had an abnormal SPECT study. In the reproducibility substudy the minimal CAC group had the largest variability (86.0%) whereas the severe CAC group had the lowest variability (9.5%).
CONCLUSION: CAC screening with MDCT is justified for asymptomatic patients with 3 or more cardiac risk factors. However, risk factor assessment is poor at predicting which individuals will have CAC if fewer risk factors are present. In terms of the interscan variability, MDCT is capable of following changes in CAC for patients with Agatston scores greater than 100. Finally, this study demonstrated that an Agatston score of 400 is a logical threshold to initiate follow-up myocardial perfusion SPECT testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668770     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(03)00653-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  37 in total

1.  Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people: role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests.

Authors:  P Greenland; S C Smith; S M Grundy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Incidence and significance of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  J H McCarthy; F J Palmer
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1974-05

4.  Probabilistic model for prediction of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease using electron beam computed tomography calcium score strata.

Authors:  L F Bielak; J A Rumberger; P F Sheedy; R S Schwartz; P A Peyser
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-07-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events.

Authors:  Roberto Wayhs; Allan Zelinger; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients.

Authors:  R Haberl; A Becker; A Leber; A Knez; C Becker; C Lang; R Brüning; M Reiser; G Steinbeck
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle.

Authors:  M J Stampfer; F B Hu; J E Manson; E B Rimm; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology.

Authors:  G Sangiorgi; J A Rumberger; A Severson; W D Edwards; J Gregoire; L A Fitzpatrick; R S Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study.

Authors:  J A Rumberger; D B Simons; L A Fitzpatrick; P F Sheedy; R S Schwartz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry.

Authors:  M B Mock; I Ringqvist; L D Fisher; K B Davis; B R Chaitman; N T Kouchoukos; G C Kaiser; E Alderman; T J Ryan; R O Russell; S Mullin; D Fray; T Killip
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  27 in total

1.  Coronary calcium scoring: what does it really mean?

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Maria P Rumsey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Complementary roles of coronary calcium scanning and myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT.

Authors:  Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Relationship between Calcium Score and Myocardial Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Fabio Paiva Rossini Siqueira; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Alair Augusto Sarmet M Damas Dos Santos; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Lack of correlation between coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Rosman; Michael Shapiro; Anuragini Pandey; Andrew VanTosh; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Computed tomographic imaging within nuclear cardiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Redefining the low-risk patient with significant atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Diagnostic and clinical benefit of combined coronary calcium and perfusion assessment in patients undergoing PET/CT myocardial perfusion stress imaging.

Authors:  Kevin A Bybee; John Lee; Richard Markiewicz; Ryan Longmore; A Iain McGhie; James H O'Keefe; Bai-Ling Hsu; Kevin Kennedy; Randall C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Use of coronary calcium scanning for predicting inducible myocardial ischemia: Influence of patients' clinical presentation.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Nathan D Wong; Leslee J Shaw; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Vascular calcification in diabetes: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Matthew J Budoff; John E Hokanson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.