Literature DB >> 14668615

Neurologic intensive care resource use after brain tumor surgery: an analysis of indications and alternative strategies.

Wendy C Ziai1, Panayiotis N Varelas, Scott L Zeger, Marek A Mirski, John A Ulatowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Greater demand and limited resources for intensive care monitoring for patients with neurologic disease may change patterns of intensive care unit utilization. The necessity and duration of intensive care unit management for all neurosurgical patients after brain tumor resection are not clear. This study evaluates a) the preoperative and perioperative variables predictive of extended need for intensive care unit monitoring (>1 day); and b) the type and timing of intensive care unit resources in patients for whom less intensive postoperative monitoring may be feasible.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: A neurocritical care unit of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients were 158 consecutive postoperative brain tumor resection patients admitted to a neurocritical care unit within a 1-yr period (1998-1999).
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (15%) admitted to the neurocritical care unit for >24 hrs were compared with 135 (85%) patients admitted for <24 hrs. Predictors of >1-day stay in the neurocritical care unit in a logistic regression model were a tumor severity index comprising radiologic characteristics of tumor location, mass effect, and midline shift on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-50.5); an intraoperative fluid score comprising estimated blood loss, total volume of crystalloid, and other colloid/hypertonic solutions administered (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6); and postoperative intubation (odds ratio, 67.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.5-702.0). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model of independent predictors for staying >1 day in the neurocritical care unit was 0.91. Neurocritical care unit resource use was reviewed in detail for 134 of 135 patients who stayed in the neurocritical care unit for <1 day. Sixty-five (49%) patients required no interventions beyond postanesthetic care and frequent neurologic exams. A total of 226 intensive care unit interventions were performed (mean +/- sd, 1.7 +/- 2.6) in 69 (51%) patients. Ninety (67%) patients had no further interventions after the first 4 hrs. Neurocritical care unit resource use beyond 4 hrs, largely consisting of intravenous analgesic use (72% of orders), was significantly associated with female gender, benign tumor on frozen section biopsy, and postoperative intubation (chi-square, p <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A small fraction of patients require prolonged intensive care unit stay after craniotomy for tumor resection. A patient's risk of prolonged stay can be well predicted by certain radiologic findings, large intraoperative blood loss, fluid requirements, and the decision to keep the patient intubated at the end of surgery. Of those patients requiring intensive care unit resources beyond the first 4 hrs, the interventions may not be critical in nature. A prospective outcome study is required to determine feasibility, cost, and outcome of patients cared for in extended recovery and then transferred to a skilled nursing ward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668615     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098860.52812.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

1.  The Utility of Routine Intensive Care Admission for Patients Undergoing Intracranial Neurosurgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar Cimonari de Almeida; M Dustin Boone; Yosef Laviv; Burkhard S Kasper; Clark C Chen; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Postoperative intensive care unit requirements after elective craniotomy.

Authors:  Brian W Hanak; Brian P Walcott; Brian V Nahed; Alona Muzikansky; Matthew K Mian; William T Kimberly; William T Curry
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Optimizing post anesthesia care unit admission after elective craniotomy for brain tumors: a cohort study.

Authors:  Marina Munari; Alessandro De Cassai; Ludovica Sandei; Christelle Correale; Sabrina Calandra; Davide Iori; Federico Geraldini; Alessandra Vitalba; Marzia Grandis; Franco Chioffi; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Bi-frontal pneumocephalus is an independent risk factor for early postoperative agitation in adult patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective craniotomy for brain tumor: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hua-Wei Huang; Li-Mei Yan; Yan-Lin Yang; Xuan He; Xiu-Mei Sun; Yu-Mei Wang; Guo-Bin Zhang; Jian-Xin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intraparenchymal fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitoring and decompressive craniectomy in meningioma case with critical intracranial pressure: A case report during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tedy Apriawan; Rizki Meizikri; Endra Wibisono Harmawan; Heru Kustono
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-30

6.  Safety and costs analysis of early hospital discharge after brain tumour surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Iuri Santana Neville; Francisco Matos Ureña; Danilo Gomes Quadros; Davi J F Solla; Mariana Fontes Lima; Claudia Marquez Simões; Eduardo Vicentin; Ulysses Ribeiro; Robson Luis Oliveira Amorim; Wellingson Silva Paiva; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Selective Intensive Care Unit Admission After Adult Supratentorial Tumor Craniotomy: Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs.

Authors:  Mark Ter Laan; Suzanne Roelofs; Ineke Van Huet; Eddy M M Adang; Ronald H M A Bartels
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.