Literature DB >> 14668608

Decrease in PaCO2 with prone position is predictive of improved outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Luciano Gattinoni1, Federica Vagginelli, Eleonora Carlesso, Paolo Taccone, Valeria Conte, Davide Chiumello, Franco Valenza, Pietro Caironi, Antonio Pesenti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gas exchange improvement in response to the prone position is associated with an improved outcome in acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients in the pronation arm of a controlled randomized trial on prone positioning and patients enrolled in a previous pilot study of the prone position.
SETTING: Twenty-eight Italian and two Swiss intensive care units. PATIENTS: We studied 225 patients meeting the criteria for ALI or ARDS.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were in prone position for 10 days for 6 hrs/day if they met ALI/ARDS criteria when assessed each morning. Respiratory variables were recorded before and after 6 hrs of pronation with unchanged ventilatory settings.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured arterial blood gas alterations to the first pronation and the 28-day mortality rate. The independent risk factors for death in the general population were the Pao2/Fio2 ratio (odds ratio, 0.992; confidence interval, 0.986-0.998), the minute ventilation/Paco2 ratio (odds ratio, 1.003; confidence interval, 1.000-1.006), and the concentration of plasma creatinine (odds ratio, 1.385; confidence interval, 1.116-1.720). Pao2 responders (defined as the patients who increased their Pao2/Fio2 by > or =20 mm Hg, 150 patients, mean increase of 100.6 +/- 61.6 mm Hg [13.4 +/- 8.2 kPa]) had an outcome similar to the nonresponders (59 patients, mean decrease -6.3 +/- 23.7 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 3.2 kPa]; mortality rate 44% and 46%, respectively; relative risk, 1.04; confidence interval, 0.74-1.45, p =.65). The Paco2 responders (defined as patients whose Paco2 decreased by > or =1 mm Hg, 94 patients, mean decrease -6.0 +/- 6 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]) had an improved survival when compared with nonresponders (115 patients, mean increase 6 +/- 6 mm Hg [0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]; mortality rate 35.1% and 52.2%, respectively; relative risk, 1.48; confidence interval, 1.07-2.05, p =.01).
CONCLUSION: ALI/ARDS patients who respond to prone positioning with reduction of their Paco2 show an increased survival at 28 days. Improved efficiency of alveolar ventilation (decreased physiologic deadspace ratio) is an important marker of patients who will survive acute respiratory failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668608     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098032.34052.F9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  75 in total

1.  Prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents are part of standard care in severe ARDS patients: we are not sure.

Authors:  L Gattinoni; J J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effect of prone position on regional shunt, aeration, and perfusion in experimental acute lung injury.

Authors:  Torsten Richter; Giacomo Bellani; R Scott Harris; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Tilo Winkler; Jose G Venegas; Guido Musch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Unveiling alveolar recruitment: the fascinating trail between theory and practice.

Authors:  Enrico Calzia; Peter Radermacher; Thomas Bein
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Maneesh Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Prone positioning for ARDS: defining the target.

Authors:  John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Deadspace ventilation: a waste of breath!

Authors:  Pratik Sinha; Oliver Flower; Neil Soni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Relationship between gas exchange response to prone position and lung recruitability during acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Alessandro Protti; Davide Chiumello; Massimo Cressoni; Eleonora Carlesso; Cristina Mietto; Virna Berto; Marco Lazzerini; Michael Quintel; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Clinical meaning of early oxygenation improvement in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome under prolonged prone positioning.

Authors:  Kwangha Lee; Mi-Young Kim; Jung-Wan Yoo; Sang-Bum Hong; Chae-Man Lim; Younsuck Koh
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Maximillian Ragaller; Torsten Richter
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-01

10.  Bedside quantification of dead-space fraction using routine clinical data in patients with acute lung injury: secondary analysis of two prospective trials.

Authors:  Hassan Siddiki; Marija Kojicic; Guangxi Li; Murat Yilmaz; Taylor B Thompson; Rolf D Hubmayr; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.