BACKGROUND: It is well established that an excessive intake of retinol (vitamin A) is toxic; however, it has been > 25 y since the last extensive treatise of case reports on this subject. OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to identify and evaluate all individual cases of retinol toxicity published in the scientific literature that assessed the thresholds and symptoms induced by high intakes of retinol and to compare the toxicity of different physical forms of retinol preparations. DESIGN: We performed a meta-analysis of case reports on toxicity claimed to be induced by intakes of excessive amounts of dietary retinol (ie, retinol and retinyl esters in foods or supplements). Using free text and MESH (medical subheading) strategies in PubMed, we identified 248 articles in the scientific literature. From these initial articles we identified other relevant citations. The final database consisted of 259 cases in which individual data on dose, sex, age, time of exposure, and symptoms are reported. RESULTS: Chronic hypervitaminosis A is induced after daily doses of 2 mg retinol/kg in oil-based preparations for many months or years. In contrast, doses as low as 0.2 mg retinol. kg(-1). d(-1) in water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations for only a few weeks caused chronic hypervitaminosis A. Thus, water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations of retinol are approximately 10 times as toxic as are oil-based retinol preparations. The safe upper single dose of retinol in oil or liver seems to be approximately 4-6 mg/kg body wt. These thresholds do not vary considerably with age. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that the physical form of retinol supplements is a major determinant of toxicity. The use of water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations of retinol should therefore be carefully considered before being used in supplements and fortifications.
BACKGROUND: It is well established that an excessive intake of retinol (vitamin A) is toxic; however, it has been > 25 y since the last extensive treatise of case reports on this subject. OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to identify and evaluate all individual cases of retinoltoxicity published in the scientific literature that assessed the thresholds and symptoms induced by high intakes of retinol and to compare the toxicity of different physical forms of retinol preparations. DESIGN: We performed a meta-analysis of case reports on toxicity claimed to be induced by intakes of excessive amounts of dietary retinol (ie, retinol and retinyl esters in foods or supplements). Using free text and MESH (medical subheading) strategies in PubMed, we identified 248 articles in the scientific literature. From these initial articles we identified other relevant citations. The final database consisted of 259 cases in which individual data on dose, sex, age, time of exposure, and symptoms are reported. RESULTS:Chronic hypervitaminosis A is induced after daily doses of 2 mg retinol/kg in oil-based preparations for many months or years. In contrast, doses as low as 0.2 mg retinol. kg(-1). d(-1) in water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations for only a few weeks caused chronic hypervitaminosis A. Thus, water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations of retinol are approximately 10 times as toxic as are oil-based retinol preparations. The safe upper single dose of retinol in oil or liver seems to be approximately 4-6 mg/kg body wt. These thresholds do not vary considerably with age. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that the physical form of retinol supplements is a major determinant of toxicity. The use of water-miscible, emulsified, and solid preparations of retinol should therefore be carefully considered before being used in supplements and fortifications.
Authors: Ricardo Fagundes da Rocha; Marcos Roberto de Oliveira; Patrícia Schonhofen; Marco Antônio De Bastiani; Carlos Eduardo Schnorr; Fábio Klamt; Felipe Dal Pizzol; José Claudio Fonseca Moreira Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: Marcos Roberto de Oliveira; Ricardo Fagundes da Rocha; Laura Stertz; Gabriel Rodrigo Fries; Diogo Losch de Oliveira; Flávio Kapczinski; José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2010-12-28 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk; Stanley Ip; Gowri Raman; Winifred W Yu; Thomas A Trikalinos; Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth A Yetley; Joseph Lau Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Asim Maqbool; Rose C Graham-Maar; Joan I Schall; Babette S Zemel; Virginia A Stallings Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Marcos Roberto de Oliveira; Roberta Bristot Silvestrin; Tadeu Mello e Souza; José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2007-08-22 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Marcos Roberto de Oliveira; Max William Soares Oliveira; Guilherme Antônio Behr; Matheus Augusto de Bittencourt Pasquali; José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Anne Marte W Johansen; Rolv T Lie; Allen J Wilcox; Lene F Andersen; Christian A Drevon Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-03-14 Impact factor: 5.363