OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), density (PSAD), and PSAD adjusted by transition zone volume (PSATZD) in men with PSA levels between 2.1 and 4.0ng/ml. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 69 men with PSA levels between 2.1 and 4.0ng/ml underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and 8-core prostate biopsy. Diagnostic accuracies for various cut-offs of PSAD and PSATZD were investigated according to subdivided PSA levels of 2.1 to 3.0ng/ml and 3.1 to 4.0ng/ml. RESULTS: The detection rate of prostate cancer was 21.7% (15/69). The percentage of patients with extracapsular disease was 33.3% (5/15) and primary Gleason grade 4 or 5 was obtained in 4 (26.7%) patients. The transition zone volume and PSATZD in cancer cases were significantly different in comparison with those in non-cancer cases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PSATZD was significantly higher in comparison with that for PSAD in the same subdivided PSA ranges. The diagnostic efficiency for PSATZD was higher than that for PSAD. The diagnostic efficiency showed the highest value at the cut-off level for PSATZD of 0.23 and 0.28 in men with PSA levels of 2.1 to 3.0ng/ml and 3.1 to 4.0ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSATZD cut-offs as a biopsy indication may reduce many unnecessary biopsies without missing most prostate cancer cases in the PSA range of 2.1 to 4.0ng/ml.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), density (PSAD), and PSAD adjusted by transition zone volume (PSATZD) in men with PSA levels between 2.1 and 4.0ng/ml. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 69 men with PSA levels between 2.1 and 4.0ng/ml underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and 8-core prostate biopsy. Diagnostic accuracies for various cut-offs of PSAD and PSATZD were investigated according to subdivided PSA levels of 2.1 to 3.0ng/ml and 3.1 to 4.0ng/ml. RESULTS: The detection rate of prostate cancer was 21.7% (15/69). The percentage of patients with extracapsular disease was 33.3% (5/15) and primary Gleason grade 4 or 5 was obtained in 4 (26.7%) patients. The transition zone volume and PSATZD in cancer cases were significantly different in comparison with those in non-cancer cases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PSATZD was significantly higher in comparison with that for PSAD in the same subdivided PSA ranges. The diagnostic efficiency for PSATZD was higher than that for PSAD. The diagnostic efficiency showed the highest value at the cut-off level for PSATZD of 0.23 and 0.28 in men with PSA levels of 2.1 to 3.0ng/ml and 3.1 to 4.0ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSATZD cut-offs as a biopsy indication may reduce many unnecessary biopsies without missing most prostate cancer cases in the PSA range of 2.1 to 4.0ng/ml.
Authors: Changhee Yoo; Cheol Young Oh; Se Joong Kim; Sun Il Kim; Young Sig Kim; Jong Yeon Park; Do Hwan Seong; Yun Seob Song; Won Jae Yang; Hyun Chul Chung; In Rae Cho; Sung Yong Cho; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Sungjoon Hong; Jin Seon Cho Journal: Korean J Urol Date: 2012-06-19
Authors: Antonio C Westphalen; Farhad Fazel; Hao Nguyen; Miguel Cabarrus; Katryana Hanley-Knutson; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2019 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.541