Literature DB >> 14667119

Retrograde vs. antegrade puncture for infra-inguinal angioplasty.

C Nice1, G Timmons, P Bartholemew, R Uberoi.   

Abstract

This study was done to compare antegrade punctures with a retrograde puncture technique for infrainguinal angioplasty. A group of 100 consecutive patients (71 men, 29 women) were randomized for antegrade puncture or retrograde puncture of the common femoral artery. Following retrograde puncture the guidewire was 'turned' and placed into the superficial femoral artery. The time for gaining access, screening time, radiation dose, patient height, weight and complications were recorded. All patients were reviewed the day after the procedure and within 3 months. Data from 46 patients (34 males and 12 females) in the retrograde group and 44 (28 males and 16 females) in the antegrade group were available for analysis. Mean procedure time, screening time, radiation dose, height and weight were 8.3 minutes (range 3-22), 2.1 minutes (0.3-6.5), 7950 mGy cm(-2) (820-71250), 169 cm (149-204) and 79 kg (32-108) for retrograde puncture and 8 min (2-60), 0.7 min (0.0-3.2), 1069 mGy cm(-2) (0-15400), 169 cm (152-186) and 75 kg (39-125) for antegrade punctures, respectively. An average of 1.2 (1-2) punctures was required for retrograde and 1.75 (1-8) for antegrade. Seven small hematomas occurred with antegrade and three for retrograde puncture. Retrograde puncture is technically easier with a tendency to fewer complications but results in a higher radiation dose. This technique should be used in difficult patients at high risk of haematoma formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14667119     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-003-2721-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery.

Authors:  A Gutzeit; N Graf; E Schoch; T Sautter; R Jenelten; C A Binkert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Antegrade common femoral artery closure device use is associated with decreased complications.

Authors:  Joel L Ramirez; Devin S Zarkowsky; Thomas A Sorrentino; Caitlin W Hicks; Shant M Vartanian; Warren J Gasper; Michael S Conte; James C Iannuzzi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Endovascular Interventions to Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion: Different Approaches, Technique, and Follow-up.

Authors:  Santhosh Krishnappa; Jayasheelan Mambally Rachaiah; Harsha Mullusoge Mariappa; Chaitra Doddamadaiah; Manjunath Cholenahally Nanjappa
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2020-06-29

5.  An effective guidewire looping technique for the recanalization of occlusive segments of infrapopliteal vessels.

Authors:  Jian-bo Wang; Jun-gong Zhao; Ming-hua Li; Yue-qi Zhu; Jue Wang; Pei-lei Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Application of relay puncture technique in treating patients with complicated lower extremity arterial diseases.

Authors:  Chengzhi Li; Huimin You; Hong Zhang; Yulong Liu; Wanghai Li; Xiaobai Wang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.