PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) intraoperative ultrasound may be easier to interpret when used in combination with less noisy preoperative image data such as CT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of preoperative image data in a 3D ultrasound-based navigation system specially designed for minimally invasive abdominal surgery. A prototype system has been tested in patients with aortic aneurysms undergoing clinical assessment before and after abdominal aortic stent-graft implantation. METHODS: All patients were first imaged by spiral CT followed by 3D ultrasound scanning. The CT volume was registered to the patient using fiducial markers. This enabled us to compare corresponding slices from 3D ultrasound and CT volumes. The accuracy of the patient registration was evaluated both using the external fiducial markers (artificial landmarks glued on the patient's skin) and using intraoperative 3D ultrasound as a measure of the true positioning of anatomic landmarks inside the body. RESULTS: The mean registration accuracy on the surface was found to be 7.1 mm, but increased to 13.0 mm for specific landmarks inside the body. CT and ultrasound gave supplementary information of surrounding structures and position of the patient's anatomy. Fine-tuning the initial patient registration of the CT data with a multimodal CT to intraoperative 3D ultrasound registration (e.g., mutual information), as well as ensuring no movements between this registration and image guidance, may improve the registration accuracy. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CT in combination with 3D ultrasound might be helpful for guiding minimal invasive abdominal interventions.
PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) intraoperative ultrasound may be easier to interpret when used in combination with less noisy preoperative image data such as CT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of preoperative image data in a 3D ultrasound-based navigation system specially designed for minimally invasive abdominal surgery. A prototype system has been tested in patients with aortic aneurysms undergoing clinical assessment before and after abdominal aortic stent-graft implantation. METHODS: All patients were first imaged by spiral CT followed by 3D ultrasound scanning. The CT volume was registered to the patient using fiducial markers. This enabled us to compare corresponding slices from 3D ultrasound and CT volumes. The accuracy of the patient registration was evaluated both using the external fiducial markers (artificial landmarks glued on the patient's skin) and using intraoperative 3D ultrasound as a measure of the true positioning of anatomic landmarks inside the body. RESULTS: The mean registration accuracy on the surface was found to be 7.1 mm, but increased to 13.0 mm for specific landmarks inside the body. CT and ultrasound gave supplementary information of surrounding structures and position of the patient's anatomy. Fine-tuning the initial patient registration of the CT data with a multimodal CT to intraoperative 3D ultrasound registration (e.g., mutual information), as well as ensuring no movements between this registration and image guidance, may improve the registration accuracy. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CT in combination with 3D ultrasound might be helpful for guiding minimal invasive abdominal interventions.
Authors: Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Neil Glossop; Michael Dake; William F Pritchard; Alberto Chiesa; Matthew R Dreher; Thomas Tang; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: R Mårvik; T Langø; G A Tangen; J O Andersen; J H Kaspersen; B Ystgaard; E Sjølie; R Fougner; H E Fjøsne; T A Nagelhus Hernes Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-06-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Verónica García-Vázquez; Felix von Haxthausen; Sonja Jäckle; Christian Schumann; Ivo Kuhlemann; Juljan Bouchagiar; Anna-Catharina Höfer; Florian Matysiak; Gereon Hüttmann; Jan Peter Goltz; Markus Kleemann; Floris Ernst; Marco Horn Journal: Innov Surg Sci Date: 2018-10-04