BACKGROUND: The tricyclic cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib exhibit different magnitudes of antiproliferative activity against the human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP and PC-3. We investigated the correlation between the COX-2 inhibitory potencies, antiproliferative activities and the nature of the central ring system of novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors belonging to the diarylcycloalkyl and diarylheterocyclic classes possessing a central 3-membered cyclopropyl (1 and 2), a 5-membered isoxazoline (3), an isoxazole (4) or 2-(5H) furanone (5), and a 6-membered pyran-2-one (6a-c) ring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Novel tricyclics were synthesized and evaluated in vitro for their COX-1/COX-2 inhibitory activities and their abilities to inhibit cell proliferation in prostate (AT3B-1, PC-3 and LNCaP) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines. A molecular modeling study was carried out to characterize the electronic nature of the central ring systems of the novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors. RESULTS: The isoxazoline (3), which exhibited excellent COX-2 inhibitory potency and selectivity, showed growth inhibition in all the cell lines tested with IC50 values of 349 microM (AT3B-1), 378 microM (PC-3), 100 microM (LNCaP) and 200 microM (MCF-7), respectively. The rofecoxib analog (5) and 6-membered pyran-2-ones (6a-c) showed weak inhibition (MCF-7, AT3-B-1 and PC-3) inspite of possessing good COX-2 inhibitory potencies and selectivities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the antiproliferative activity profiles exhibited by the novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors is dependent on the electronic nature of the central ring system and is independent of their COX-2 inhibitory potencies and selectivities. Accordingly, the 2,3-dimethyl-5-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-4-phenyl-4-isoxazoline (3), which possesses an electron rich central 5-membered isoxazole ring, could serve as a lead compound to develop novel drugs to treat prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: The tricyclic cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib exhibit different magnitudes of antiproliferative activity against the humanprostate cancer cell lines LNCaP and PC-3. We investigated the correlation between the COX-2 inhibitory potencies, antiproliferative activities and the nature of the central ring system of novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors belonging to the diarylcycloalkyl and diarylheterocyclic classes possessing a central 3-membered cyclopropyl (1 and 2), a 5-membered isoxazoline (3), an isoxazole (4) or 2-(5H) furanone (5), and a 6-membered pyran-2-one (6a-c) ring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Novel tricyclics were synthesized and evaluated in vitro for their COX-1/COX-2 inhibitory activities and their abilities to inhibit cell proliferation in prostate (AT3B-1, PC-3 and LNCaP) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines. A molecular modeling study was carried out to characterize the electronic nature of the central ring systems of the novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors. RESULTS: The isoxazoline (3), which exhibited excellent COX-2 inhibitory potency and selectivity, showed growth inhibition in all the cell lines tested with IC50 values of 349 microM (AT3B-1), 378 microM (PC-3), 100 microM (LNCaP) and 200 microM (MCF-7), respectively. The rofecoxib analog (5) and 6-membered pyran-2-ones (6a-c) showed weak inhibition (MCF-7, AT3-B-1 and PC-3) inspite of possessing good COX-2 inhibitory potencies and selectivities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the antiproliferative activity profiles exhibited by the novel tricyclic COX-2 inhibitors is dependent on the electronic nature of the central ring system and is independent of their COX-2 inhibitory potencies and selectivities. Accordingly, the 2,3-dimethyl-5-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-4-phenyl-4-isoxazoline (3), which possesses an electron rich central 5-membered isoxazole ring, could serve as a lead compound to develop novel drugs to treat prostate cancer.
Authors: Frank Michael Klenke; Amir Abdollahi; Marc Bischof; Martha-Maria Gebhard; Volker Ewerbeck; Peter E Huber; Axel Sckell Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Elisabeth I Heath; Janet R Walczak; William G Nelson; Helen Fedor; Angelo M De Marzo; Marianna L Zahurak; Steven Piantadosi; Andrew J Dannenberg; Robin T Gurganus; Sharyn D Baker; Howard L Parnes; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Michael A Carducci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frank Michael Klenke; Martha-Maria Gebhard; Volker Ewerbeck; Amir Abdollahi; Peter E Huber; Axel Sckell Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Raju Dash; Mir Muhammad Nasir Uddin; S M Zahid Hosen; Zahed Bin Rahim; Abu Mansur Dinar; Mohammad Shah Hafez Kabir; Ramiz Ahmed Sultan; Ashekul Islam; Md Kamrul Hossain Journal: Bioinformation Date: 2015-12-31