Literature DB >> 14666419

Habitat overlap of enemies: temporal patterns and the role of spatial complexity.

Stephanie E Hampton1.   

Abstract

Environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence of conflicting species by providing spatial or temporal refuges from strong interactions (e.g., intraguild predation, competition). However, in many systems, refuge availability and effectiveness may change through time and space because of variability in habitat use by either species. Here I consider how the intensity of intraguild predation risk varies from day to night for aquatic insects that use both vegetated and open water habitats. Large (1,265 l) and small (42 l) mesocosms were used to test the hypothesis that Buenoa would choose an open-water habitat that minimized predation by the ambush predator Notonecta during the day, but that at night Buenoa would safely use both vegetated and open water. Regardless of container size, Notonecta remained in vegetated water during the day and exploited both habitats at night, despite exhibiting greatest instantaneous predation rates in open water during the day. In contrast, Buenoa maintained an even distribution throughout the mesocosms during day and night, even though habitat-specific predation risks were fivefold lower in open waters than in vegetation during the day and habitat-specific predation risk would have been reduced threefold by fully exploiting open waters. Thus, temporal heterogeneity was both beneficial and detrimental to Buenoa; darkness of night reduced predation, but spatial refuges also disappeared. Together, these patterns suggest that while environmental heterogeneity can dampen intense biotic interactions, enemies do not select habitats solely on the basis of conflict avoidance. Instead, it appears that habitat-specific variation in other biotic (e.g., visual predators) or physical factors (e.g., UV radiation) may also mediate species interactions by influencing habitat selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14666419     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1446-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  The impact of ultraviolet radiation on the vertical distribution of zooplankton of the genus Daphnia.

Authors:  S C Rhode; M Pawlowski; R Tollrian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations.

Authors:  A Kacelnik; J R Krebs; C Bernstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Predation risk and the structure of freshwater zooplankton communities.

Authors:  Craig E Williamson; Mark E Stoeckel; L Jane Schoeneck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  FLUCTUATING SELECTION AND RESPONSE IN A POPULATION OF FRESHWATER COPEPODS.

Authors:  Nelson G Hairston; Theresa A Dillon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effect of prey size on attack components of the functional response by Notonecta undulata.

Authors:  F A Streams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  How does habitat complexity affect ant foraging success? A test using functional measures on three continents.

Authors:  H Gibb; C L Parr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Malaria vector control: from past to future.

Authors:  Kamaraju Raghavendra; Tapan K Barik; B P Niranjan Reddy; Poonam Sharma; Aditya P Dash
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Spatial avoidance of littoral and pelagic invertebrate predators by Daphnia.

Authors:  Frank Van de Meutter; Robby Stoks; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predicting species interactions from edge responses: mongoose predation on hawksbill sea turtle nests in fragmented beach habitat.

Authors:  Patrick A Leighton; Julia A Horrocks; Barry H Krueger; Jennifer A Beggs; Donald L Kramer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A critical time window for organismal interactions in a pelagic ecosystem.

Authors:  Kelly J Benoit-Bird; Margaret A McManus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Larvicidal Potential of Five Selected Dragonfly Nymphs in Sri Lanka over Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) Larvae under Laboratory Settings.

Authors:  Chathurika Samanmali; Lahiru Udayanga; Tharaka Ranathunge; Sandun J Perera; Menaka Hapugoda; Chathura Weliwitiya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Space use of African wild dogs in relation to other large carnivores.

Authors:  Angela M Darnell; Jan A Graf; Michael J Somers; Rob Slotow; Micaela Szykman Gunther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fine-Scale Habitat Segregation between Two Ecologically Similar Top Predators.

Authors:  Francisco Palomares; Néstor Fernández; Severine Roques; Cuauhtemoc Chávez; Leandro Silveira; Claudia Keller; Begoña Adrados
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.